Thoughts?
Filed under: 2012, Debates | 19 Comments »
Thoughts?
Filed under: 2012, Debates | 19 Comments »
Sam Houston Clinton chaired the D State Convention in ’72. He was General Counsel to the AFL-CIO and the TCLU. He was a “lawyer’s lawyer” who had won three notable cases in the US S.Ct., one of which you may remember; the reversal of Jack Ruby’s conviction. Sam looked like John Wayne and was a hero to most young lawyers in Austin.
In August 1972, the McGovern Campaign asked to meet with Sam. He set the meeting for my firm’s conference room and invited my partner and me to sit in, but not to speak unless spoken to. The Campaign wanted Sam’s views on how to carry TX.
Taylor Branch and a black woman whose name eludes me represented the Campaign.
Sam told them that the rural/small-town weeklies had not yet weighed in and they could be “had” for McG. He suggested a column ad, topped by a photo of McG stepping out of his B24, captioned “decorated WW2 bombardier”. The ad would stress that McG was the son of a Methodist minister, had won the DisFlyingCross, had always voted for gun rights, and would close with the pledge to help [D nominee for] Gov. Briscoe eradicate screw worms in TX.
The black woman laughed. “SCREW worms?” Sam patiently and colorfully described how these larvae were hatched in the nostrils, worked their way to the brain, and destroyed not individual cows, but herds. He explained that Briscoe and the TX D Admin were getting a cold shoulder from Nixon’s USDA, and that ranchers throughout the plains were suffering.
Then Branch said “We cannot say that about gun rights.” Sam pointed to McG’s voting record, which was pure SD and against gun control. Branch explained that it would not fly in L.A. Sam allowed as how he had been asked how McG could win in TX; polls showed Nixon would carry CA no matter what. The meeting ended and so did McG’s prospects of running a competitive race in TX.
Another of my mentor lawyers was Will Davis, a conservative D who, for example, wrote insurance law for the insurance lobby. Will authored the [in]famous McGovern Rules which changed the national D Party from boss run to unmanageable in that election, but which have survived pretty much in tact to this time. Even the Rs have copied some of the McG Rules reforms.
Those were my connections to that campaign. Also, I met his wife, who was gorgeous and charming. This is not apparent in photos on the net, btw. She was petite with curves in the right places and sparkling eyes and short honey blonde hair and a dazzling smile.
LaterSummer of ’78, he co-sponsored a bill with Goldwater to intervene militarily in Cambodia or Laos, I don’t recall. It was beaten down in the Senate as badly as the two men had been beaten for POTUS. McG was asked by someone how a former anti-war candidate could support an intervention war. He explained he was not anti-war. Some wars are just.
Filed under: Democrats | 10 Comments »
Vital Statistics:
| Last | Change | Percent | |
| S&P Futures | 1426.5 | 2.5 | 0.18% |
| Eurostoxx Index | 2544.6 | 2.4 | 0.09% |
| Oil (WTI) | 90.51 | 0.5 | 0.51% |
| LIBOR | 0.316 | -0.002 | -0.47% |
| US Dollar Index (DXY) | 79.54 | -0.083 | -0.10% |
| 10 Year Govt Bond Yield | 1.81% | 0.04% | |
| RPX Composite Real Estate Index | 193.9 | 0.1 |
Markets are up slightly in spite of weak guidance out of Caterpillar. CAT is forecasting a 5% decline in next year’s sales based on the weak global economy. This week is heavy with earnings reports with Dupont, Facebook, 3M, Coca Cola, Conoco, and Amazon.com. On the economic front, we will have the FOMC rate decision tomorrow and the first estimate of 3Q GDP on Thursday. Bonds are down 25 ticks and MBS are down 6 or 7.
Mark Zandi of Moody’s is endorsing the the qualified mortgage rule. This rule should provide lenders some relief from litigation as long as the mortgage was underwritten in accordance with CFPB guidelines. As far as loans outside those guidelines? They “will remain toxic water for most lenders.”
Many market participants are expecting the Fed to announce that treasuries will be included in future QE. The Fed has already committed to buy $40 billion of MBS a month until unemployment is down and it surprised many observers by not including Treasuries in that statement. This caused MBS to rally way in excess of what the moves in the 10-year would predict. In some ways, this would offset the buying that would be lost when Operation Twist ends this year. Bank of America is predicting the Fed will buy $45 – $60 billion of Treasuries in addition to the $40 billion in MBS.
Still, banks are understaffed as the volume of mortgage applications swells, where timelines are being stretched from the typical 45-days to 90. Banks undoubtedly believe that the current volume is being driven by refis, which they view as temporary. The article goes on to say that mortgage rates to the consumer should be lower, but they do note the increase in guarantee fees.
Ocwen and Walter Investment are teaming up to out-bid Nationstar for Rescap.
The Bipartisan Policy Center is launching a Dodd-Frank initiative, where they try and do a “cost-benefits” analysis to Dodd-Frank. They frame it as a “stability vs growth” issue.
Filed under: Morning Report | Leave a comment »
I was reading Frum this morning and found a link to Tom Ricks’ list of nominees for worst general in American history. Here’s his list:
1. Douglas MacArthur
2. Benedict Arnold
3. Ned Almond
4. Tommy R. Franks
5. William Westmoreland
6. George McClellan
7. Ambrose Burnside
8. Horatio Gates
So, what do you all think? Any other nominees? I think Custer, Mark Clark, Rosecrans, Bragg, and maybe Fredenall deserve mention. But I can’t argue with the top slot coming from one of Ricks’ 8 nominees.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Leadership, Military | 19 Comments »
Halfway mark, and this week’s post will be short and sweet because I got tied up last night and the first kickoffs are in just an hour. Thursday there must have been something in the air in Texas, because SMU beat Houston 72 – 42 (that sounds like a basketball score–are we sure it was played in a stadium?). Oregon beat Arizona State 43 – 21 in Pac-12 action, then last night Syracuse beat UConn 40 – 10. Today’s games:
Oklahoma State is hosting Iowa State (line: OSU, spread 13). That other osu is hosting Purdue (line: osu, spread 14.5). Go, Boilermakers!
Minnesota is at Wisconsin (line: UW, spread 17.5). I love ’em both, so bsimon and Brent get to argue over this one.
Stanford is playing Cal (line: Stanford, spread 1.5).
Boston College is visiting Georgia Tech (line: GT, spread 13). Scott and yellojkt can go at it in comments.
Nebraska is at Northwestern (line: Nebraska, spread 7).
BYU is playing Notre Dame in an independents’ battle (line: ND, spread 14).
USF is at Louisville (line: Louisville, spread 9). Go, Bulls!
MSU is in The Big House this week (line: UM, spread 10.5). The only game that can salvage the season. . . Go Green, Go White!
Kansas is at Oklahoma (line: OU, spread 35.5). Boomer Sooner!
Baylor is at Texas for one of the late games tonight (line: UT, spread 13) and Penn State is at Iowa for another (line: Iowa, spread 1.5).
Finally, Washington is at Arizona for the really late games (line: ‘Cats, spread 4.5) and Utah at Oregon State is the other (line: OSU, spread 7.5).
Happy Saturday!
Filed under: Fall, Football, Open Thread | 19 Comments »
Vital Statistics:
| Last | Change | Percent | |
| S&P Futures | 1448.5 | -3.0 | -0.21% |
| Eurostoxx Index | 2548.0 | -26.2 | -1.02% |
| Oil (WTI) | 92.29 | 0.2 | 0.21% |
| LIBOR | 0.317 | -0.002 | -0.47% |
| US Dollar Index (DXY) | 79.52 | 0.151 | 0.19% |
| 10 Year Govt Bond Yield | 1.81% | -0.02% | |
| RPX Composite Real Estate Index | 193.8 | 0.1 |
Markets are weaker this morning after earnings misses from bellwethers Google, Microsoft, McDonalds, and GE. Euro sovereign yields continue to decrease. Bonds and MBS are up about 1/4 of a point.
The CFPB is starting to put some more meat on the bones with respect to a qualifying mortgage. Lenders would be protected from penalties if the borrower is given a prime rate and the back-end debt ratio doesn’t exceed 43%. The NAR has already weighed in saying that “any partial safe harbor would need to go much further to avoid harm to the mortgage market.”
The Mortgage Bankers Association has sent a letter regarding proposed Basel III rules. They correctly note that the penalties on mortgage servicing rights are going to create a problem. Add the proposed new servicing standards out of the CFPB, and you may in fact turn mortgage servicing into a business nobody wants to perform.
While institutional investors are raising money to get into the REO-to-rental businesses, one of the pioneers, hedge fund Och Ziff, is looking to cash out. Turns out that renting properties on such a vast scale isn’t as profitable as it initially appears.
Today is the 25th anniversary of the Crash of 87. I think in some ways, we can trace the origins of the financial crisis to this event. During the crash, newly appointed Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan pledged the Federal Reserve would provide liquidity to anyone who needed it. At the time, it was probably the right thing to do, as it prevented the stock market crash from ballooning into something bigger. I think the Chairman recognized its success and used it every time the financial markets had a hiccup – from the Mexican Peso Crisis, to Long Term Capital, to the Asian Crisis. This behavior became affectionately known as the “Greenspan Put,” which means that even if you screw up, the Fed will come to the rescue. This created a underpricing of risk, which laid the groundwork for the real estate bubble. Real estate prices became unmoored from their traditional relationship with incomes around the year 2000, just as the stock market bubble was going critical, and continued to inflate as the Fed flooded the system with liquidity in the aftermath. And since the Fed is still doing the same thing in response to the burst real estate bubble, this time on steroids, the game continues..
Filed under: Morning Report | 15 Comments »
Vital Statistics:
| Last | Change | Percent | |
| S&P Futures | 1453.1 | -4.0 | -0.27% |
| Eurostoxx Index | 2561.6 | -8.2 | -0.32% |
| Oil (WTI) | 91.7 | -0.4 | -0.46% |
| LIBOR | 0.319 | -0.002 | -0.62% |
| US Dollar Index (DXY) | 79.14 | 0.120 | 0.15% |
| 10 Year Govt Bond Yield | 1.80% | -0.02% | |
| RPX Composite Real Estate Index | 193.7 | 0.5 |
Markets are weaker on a weaker this morning ahead of the EU summit in Brussels. Euro sovereign yields continue to drop, which means the benign backdrop to the markets continues. Earnings reports continue to exceed expectations, though the bar is set very low this quarter. Bonds and MBS are slightly higher.
It turns out that last week’s dramatic drop in initial jobless claims was due to technical problems with seasonal adjustments in one state, as reported by CNBC. Initial Jobless Claims increased to 388k from a revised 342k last week.
The Leading Economic Indicators had a big jump, up from -.4 to + .6, We still seem to be oscillating around 0, with a positive reading followed by a negative one. This is indicative of a slow growth trend.
Similarly, the Philly Fed Business Outlook Survey noted that conditions in the manufacturing sector remain weak. Labor conditions dropped as 22% of all firms reported decreases in employment and 11% reported increases. The average workweek dropped as well. In terms of the mix of employees, more firms decreased the number of full-time employees and increased the number of temp workers.
Prepare for a battle over the fiscal cliff. No tax hikes on the wealthy, no deal. Of course Obama has said that before.
The WSJ discusses yesterday’s big housing starts number. As the inventory of foreclosures declines and underwater sellers sense a turnaround in pricing, more and more buyers are looking to new construction. Foreclosures as a percent of sales dropped to 14% in September, and are down from 50% a couple of years ago.
Filed under: Morning Report | 9 Comments »
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
Another liberal female is quitting ATiM. (And there never were any conservative females here, so that makes it pretty misogynist.) Hooray! Michi is the only one left.
Aren’t you guys really proud? Heh.
Filed under: administrative | 45 Comments »
Vital Statistics:
| Last | Change | Percent | |
| S&P Futures | 1453.8 | 4.6 | 0.32% |
| Eurostoxx Index | 2557.0 | 9.1 | 0.36% |
| Oil (WTI) | 92.48 | 0.4 | 0.42% |
| LIBOR | 0.321 | -0.004 | -1.23% |
| US Dollar Index (DXY) | 78.96 | -0.444 | -0.56% |
| 10 Year Govt Bond Yield | 1.77% | 0.06% | |
| RPX Composite Real Estate Index | 193.3 | -0.1 |
Markets are higher after a strong report on housing starts. The banks reported good numbers while the techs disappointed. Mortgage applications fell, while building permits came in well above expectations. Signs of strength in housing are pushing yields higher on Treasuries and MBS
Housing starts were 872k in September a rise of 15% MOM and 35% YOY. Proportionally, multi-family had the biggest increase, which speaks to the strength in the rental market. While this level is a 4 year high, it still is just about the same level as the nadirs following the 82-82 and 91-92 recessions. So we have a long way to go to get back to “normalcy” which is around 1.5 million, but things seem to be picking up in the housing sector, which has been a major drag on the economy.
Will investors do the heavy lifting of shrinking the TBTF banks? Given languishing stock prices and large discounts to book value, shareholders will be pressuring the banks to exit marginal businesses and either sell them or spin them off to shareholders. For example, Citi’s investment banking division is about the size of Goldman Sachs. Goldman trades at an 11 multiple, while Morgan Stanley trades at a 30 multiple. It would make sense for Citi, which trades at a 9.7 P/E to spin off the investment bank, which should unlock shareholder value. Maybe they could resurrect the old Salomon Brothers.
The WSJ was out with a story last night which said the CFPB is considering giving lenders safe harbor if they originate a qualified mortgage. It sounds like this safe harbor wouldn’t insulate the banks from buyback risk, but it would insulate them from lawsuits and penalties from the government. If there isn’t any protection from buyback risk, I am not sure how much this would end up mattering in the end.
Filed under: Morning Report | 14 Comments »
Don’t know if any of you will be interested, but I thought I’d toss this out there. Open thread, so if you don’t feel like saying anything about the debate, chime in with whatever’s on your mind!
And I totally stole thisfrom Mark
Filed under: Debates, Open Thread | 177 Comments »