Brent Nyitray
Fairlington Blade
Let the mutherfuker burn!
jnc4p
Kevin S. Willis
Michigoose
lmsinca
markinaustin
Memetrics
novahockey
quarterback
ScottC
yellojktVital Statistics:
| Last | Change | |
| S&P Futures | 2839.5 | -14.0 |
| Eurostoxx Index | 397.5 | -2.3 |
| Oil (WTI) | 65.0 | -0.6 |
| US dollar index | 83.1 | -0.3 |
| 10 Year Govt Bond Yield | 2.71% | |
| Current Coupon Fannie Mae TBA | 103.591 | |
| Current Coupon Ginnie Mae TBA | 103.688 | |
| 30 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage | 4.19 |
Stocks are lower this morning on overseas weakness. Bonds and MBS are down.
The FOMC meeting starts today. This will be Janet Yellen’s last hurrah, and that will probably dominate the news more than whatever decision they make.
Consumer Confidence improved in January, according to the Conference Board. Confidence is at levels not seen since the late 90s.
Home price appreciation continues its torrid pace, according to the Case-Shiller Home Price Index. The housing market is partying like it is 2005, with the usual suspects (San Diego, LA, Lost Wages) leading the charge. Case-Shiller Chief Economist David Blitzer had this to say about home price appreciation: “Home prices continue to rise three times faster than the rate of inflation… Given slow population and income growth since the financial crisis, demand is not the primary factor in rising home prices. Construction costs, as measured by National Income and Product Accounts, recovered after the financial crisis, increasing between 2% and 4% annually, but do not explain all of the home price gains. From 2010 to the latest month of data, the construction of single family homes slowed, with single family home starts averaging 632,000 annually. This is less than the annual rate during the 2007-2009 financial crisis of 698,000, which is far less than the long-term average of slightly more than one million annually from 1959 to 2000 and 1.5 million during the 2001-2006 boom years. Without more supply, home prices may continue to substantially outpace inflation.”
The lack of supply is puzzling, however part of what has pushed demand higher has been affordability due to decreasing interest rates and increasing wages. Home price unadjusted for inflation are back to bubble levels, however when you take into account inflation, they are not. As I argued before, affordability is a function of interest rates as much as it is about home prices. Borrowers focus on the monthly payment, not necessarily the sticker price. As far as the lack of supply, I think a lot of this is standard post-bubble psychology, where lenders and builders become more risk-averse (and often overcorrect to the other direction). Yes, regulation does play a role here, however post-bubble recoveries generally are weaker than normal because of this change in psychology. Eventually fear of being caught with too much inventory translates into fear of missing out. Despite years of below-average inventory, we aren’t there yet.
The outlook for housing this year remains similar to what we have seen for the past several years – tight inventory constraints will keep sales down while rising interest rates will affect affordability. The bottleneck is tightest at the lower price points – where the first time homebuyer is most likely to be found. The latest NAR exiting home sales report has supply overall around 3.2 month’s worth. At the entry level, it is even tighter: in the price range of $125k – $250K, it is probably around 2.7 months or so. Unsurprisingly, we are seeing the biggest price appreciation in that segment as well. Here is a chart of inventory over time: We are at levels last seen during the bubble years:
Tonight Donald Trump will give his State of the Union Speech in front of Congress. The focus will be a $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan. Part of the plan will include a process for streamlining the approval process. Gary Cohn had this to say on CNBC: “He’s going to talk about a trillion and a half dollars of investment, but more importantly, he’s going to talk about streamlining the approval process on infrastructure,” Cohn said. “Right now, we have an infrastructure approval process that takes seven to 10 years to build relatively simple roads. We need to streamline that to less than two years.”
I talked about the Mick Mulvaney memo to CFPB staffers and how they intend to end regulation by enforcement action, which was the MO of the Obama / Cordray regime. The Labor Department is also ending another Obama policy of refusing to give guidance to companies that ask for it. This is yet another example of the regulatory environment taking a less adversarial approach to the private sector, and this should translate into a stronger economy and mitigate some of the risk aversion I alluded to earlier.
Tax reform is translating into more business spending headlines. Exxon-Mobil plans to add another $35 billion to its previous $15 billion expansion, and Pfizer plans to invest $5 billion. Given that capacity utilization is still historically low, this is somewhat surprising. Eventually, these newfound animal spirits have to affect the homebuilders, right?
Years of central bank manipulation of the risk free rate has created a slew of questionable investments. Remember the PIIGS? (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain – the high yielding Euro states with massive budget issues?) Portugal has lower yields than the US right now. The Japanese Central Bank has been directly buying Japanese equities. If there is one “black swan” out there right now, it is the mal-investment that has been driven by central banks pushing yields to the floor in order to support asset prices.
Filed under: Economy, Morning Report |
Love it when leftists think they understand libertarianism…
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/donald-trumps-presidency-is-the-libertarian-moment.html
LikeLike
“The latest development in the relationship between the Kochs (right-wing heirs to a business fortune) ”
Is that necessary? Everybody who disagrees with them politically apparently inherited all their wealth from Nazis or some liberal they then betrayed, I guess. I dunno. It’s just a tic those people can’t help but inject, not writing that conveys any information or insight.
“the Kochs are spending several hundred millions of dollars to protect the Republican majority”
” the Kochs are spending several hundred millions of dollars to protect the Republican majority”
Which they did in 2016 as well, they were just opposed to Trump. So in that respect, nothing has changed. But . . . sure. Whatever.
“Whatever points of contention remain between the two have been reduced to squabbles between friends.”
Again, supporting Republican congressional candidates is not support of Trump.
“plus closed borders, protectionism, and the maintenance of racial and gender hierarchies”
When did Trump pledge to maintain racial and gender hierarchies? They literally just make shit up, but not just “make it up”, they make up ridiculous garbage and then recite it as fact. And they are paid and respected (by someone, I assume) for this work.
“They could, indeed, support Democrats while still working with both parties issue by issue.”
The Koch’s do this. They have said as much. There was a whole Freakonomics devoted to Charles Koch, where he said that they support Democrats on issues where they are on the same side as the Koch’s. There just aren’t as many. Does he research anything?
LikeLike
The whole vibe of the piece is that if Libertarians were “true” Libertarians, they would be part of #TheResistance
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll cop to this:
“Indeed, libertarians have understood this problem for decades; many of them see democracy as a process that enables the majority to gang up on the rich minority and carry out legalized theft through redistribution. Their highest notion of liberty entails the protection of property rights from the democratic process, and they have historically been open to authoritarian leaders who will protect their policy agenda.”
Because democracy isn’t the basis of liberty. Private property is.
But libertarians supporting part of Trump’s agenda is no more ironic than progressives finally finding some expansion of federal power that they don’t like after 100 years of cutting down the trees as Sir Thomas Moore would have put it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
payroll just announced that tomorrow’s check will reflect the new withholding tables due to tax reform
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m told that you’ll literally receive crumbs from literally Hitler.
Thanks for colluding in the Holocaust.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am going to use the money to up my contributions to the League of Evil. I’ll be able to level up, kind of like art supports can go from contributor to a patron*.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StandardEvilEmpireHierarchy.
*Patron of Evil is great band name
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you pay for the train tracks you can deduct it as an infrastructure contribution. Then you can drive the train over the damsel in distress. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Saw them open for #ReleasetheMemo at Hammerfest ‘16.
LikeLike
“If you pay for the train tracks you can deduct it as an infrastructure contribution. Then you can drive the train over the damsel in distress”
I need to save my money for mustache wax, so I can better twirl my mustache while chortling. Speaking of which, I really need to practice my chortle.
LikeLike
You sucker! Your being scammed with more money to support racism!
LikeLike
Artfully stated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ironic!
LikeLike
Story: Facebook bans pages linked to troll farm, users upset
https://gizmodo.com/facebook-users-cry-censorship-after-being-told-which-ru-1822552451
Reason: 2016 election interference
NoVa’s solution — restrict the franchise. if you don’t’ want morons to influence the outcome of elections, don’t let them vote.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Man down!
http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=373611
LikeLike
Who watched it though?
LikeLike
I was up from 5:15AM until 5:55AM to watch it but the sky was so cloudy that all I could see was a faint reddish glow in the west, where the BlueRedHarvestLunarEclipse was supposed to be happening.
Which is to say I saw much more Eclipse than SOTU.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was a fascinating experience, as all Trump endeavors are.
My perception was that Trump twisted the knife some and made great use of props, er, guests.
Only 4 SCOTUS’s showed, so book that as a win as well.
Also, Melania was hawt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
McWing:
Only 4 SCOTUS’s showed…
Which 4?
LikeLike
Looked like Roberts, Kennedy, Kagsn snt Gorsuch.
LikeLike
Whoever watched it almost certainly had their mind made up, one way or another, already. Not me. I think the rebuttals are pointless and uniformly awful.
LikeLike
This is a really interesting piece.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/31/state-of-the-union-democrats-congress-379571
I ask all to read it and then describe it in one word.
LikeLike
Fear.
LikeLike
Typical.
LikeLike
Sen. Brown (D-OH) ” I’ve never seen a president that cares nothing about reaching out to people that didn’t vote for him.””
my word: horseshit.
LikeLike
As Obama said to Eric Cantor, “I won.”
LikeLike
i’ll note — dreamers are constantly on the docket of cases that a co-worker’s wife prosecutes in MoCo
LikeLike
Ugh.
LikeLike