Vital Statistics:

Stocks are lower this morning on no real news. Bonds and MBS are down.
Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari thinks the current rate regime will last a while. He didn’t rule out further rate hikes, although he doesn’t consider that a base case. “The FOMC targets 12-month headline inflation of 2 percent. While we saw rapid disinflation in the second half of 2023, that progress appears to have stalled in the most recent quarter (see Figure 1). The question we now face is whether the disinflationary process is in fact still underway, merely taking longer than expected, or if inflation is instead settling to around a 3 percent level, suggesting that the FOMC has more work to do to achieve our dual mandate goals.”

He also suggested that policy might not be super-restrictive given the strength of the housing market. He does mention some exogenous factors such as underbuilding post-2008, along with heavy immigration has increased demand for housing. “Policy actions by the FOMC have driven 30-year mortgage rates from around 4.0 percent prior to the pandemic to around 7.5 percent today. Perhaps that level of mortgage rates is not as contractionary for residential investment as it would have been absent these unique factors which are driving housing demand higher. In other words, perhaps a neutral rate for the housing market is higher than before the pandemic.” Since housing is the main driver of inflation these days, inflation (and therefore tight monetary policy) might stick around a while longer.
In an interview, he did say the bar is high to consider additional rate hikes, and also said we may be at current levels a while: “My colleagues and I are of course very happy that the labor market has proven resilient, but, with inflation in the most recent quarter moving sideways, it raises questions about how restrictive policy really is.”
Bottom line: if housing is the driver of inflation, and the neutral rate may be higher, then additional rate hikes might be needed to cool the housing market. Unfortunately, it is a catch-22: The problem for housing is limited supply, and higher rates don’t encourage building. But if they cut rates to stimulate building, they might stimulate speculation instead.
FWIW, I think a lot of the hottest markets (especially in FL) were driven by Air BnB speculators, and the Air BnBust is in full bloom. We are seeing price cutting in a lot of the hottest markets.
If these properties were financed with non-QM mortgages using DSCR programs, we could start seeing DQs pile up there.
Mortgage applications rose 2.5% last week as purchases rose 2% and refis rose 5%. “Treasury rates and mortgage rates fell last week on the news of a slowing job market, with wage growth at the slowest pace since 2021, and the Federal Reserve’s announced plans to ease quantitative tightening in June and to maintain its view that another rate hike is unlikely. The conventional 30-year rate dropped 11 basis points, and the FHA rate fell 17 basis points to 6.92 percent, back below 7% for the first time in three weeks,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Senior Vice President and Chief Economist. “Mortgage applications increased for the first time in three weeks, with refinances up 5 percent. Even with the increase, which included a 29 percent jump in VA refinances, refinance volume remains about 6 percent below last year’s already low levels.”
Filed under: Economy |
Interesting Taibbi take on the Steele report I hadn’t seen before:
LikeLike
Probably true but irrelevant. It will have zero effect.
LikeLike
Still think Trump has no chance?
LikeLike
Yes. No chance, R’s are unable to match D’s in ballot harvesting.
In the end, Trump dies in prison.
LikeLike
I think it is Trump’s to lose. That is, Biden can win only by Trump completely blowing Trump’s lead. Or so I think.
LikeLike
How are you doing Mark? It’s good to hear from you.
LikeLike
I found this interesting.
LikeLike
This is unbelievable, and yet on reflection, it explains so much:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/05/03/biden_economic_advisor_jared_bernstein.html
LikeLike
Even Krugman isn’t a full MMT’er.
The Bernstein clip should be in a Trump ad.
Meanwhile:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/05/04/argentina-javier-milei-proving-left-wing-economy-wrong/
LikeLike
I don’t agree with this writer on almost anything, but I think she’s correct on the algorithm and the suppression of dissent:
LikeLike
Related:
LikeLike
I don’t know if the west will lose the ability to wage war, I think those weirdos supporting Hamas would be more than happy to see western troops fighting in Ukraine. That said, it’s sustained war, the MID if you will, that Karp et al support, that they are worried about as Trump has made it ok for the Republican base to pull back from unconditional MID support.
LikeLike
This should be entertaining:
LikeLike
And this is funny:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/ohio-lawmakers-are-odds-effort-ensure-biden-appears-november-ballot-rcna151369
LikeLike
80,0000 – 100,000 people at a Trump rally.
In New Jersey.
LikeLike
Latest from the Washington Post – stop using hot water to combat climate change.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2024/05/11/cold-water-laundry-shower-dishes/
Interesting what’s considered “progress” these days.
LikeLike
As if cold showers will make a dent in global warming.
LikeLike
I like how progressives now view deprivation as progress.
In terms of quality of life, things are going backwards.
LikeLike
Engineered scarcity. Straight out of 1984.
LikeLike
Freddie DeBoer is on the same level as Matt Taibbi when it comes to snark:
LikeLike
He is right that the left is all about memory-holing 2020
LikeLike
jnc:
Freddie DeBoer is on the same level as Matt Taibbi when it comes to snark:
He makes some good points, but personally I kept finding myself thinking “That’s an interesting critique, but dude…you are a Marxist in the 21st century? Seriously?”
LikeLike
He’s not the only one. I find that the Marxists (real old school ones, not the new identity based idiots) sometimes have a good observation or critique of a current problem but their solutions are often lacking.
In general, I find that you know things are really fucked when the Marxists start making sense.
This is still one of the best things I’ve ever seen produced from an actual old school Marxist, even if you don’t agree 100% with it:
LikeLike
Also he holds the left side accountable for their hypocrisy:
https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/we-closed-the-institutions-that-housed
LikeLike
I think there are a lot of people on the left who think AI and automation will mean that tech can do all the work, and people will be able to lead a life of leisure. They want the government to confiscate the technology and distribute the fruits of it.
LikeLike
Vox tries to one up the Washington Post when it comes to annoying progessivism:
Speed limits are too darn high
Drivers don’t need to go faster than 20 mph on most city streets.
By Marin Cogan@marincogan
May 13, 2024, 6:30am EDT
https://www.vox.com/24153725/speed-limits-pedestrian-deaths-sammys-law-nyc
LikeLike
Why is she setting such a low target? If we lowered the speed limit to 3 miles per hour, we could virtually eliminate pedestrian fatalities.
LikeLike
“There’s a reason why cities and states are lowering the speed limit to 20 mph: It’s the speed at which most pedestrians who get hit by a car still have a good chance of survival. Above that, risk rises exponentially: A person hit by a vehicle going 30 miles per hour is 70 percent more likely to be killed than by a car going 25. The average risk of death reaches 50 percent when the driver is going 42 mph, and 90 percent at 58 mph — above that, a pedestrian’s chances of survival get very slim.”
LikeLike
And the NY Times makes three. This has the makings of a winning platform:
LikeLike
10 years ago, the idea of means-testing social security was radioactive.
LikeLike
These focus groups are always an interesting read:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/15/opinion/trump-women-focus-group.html
LikeLike