Morning Report: Is real estate really an inflation hedge?

Vital Statistics:

 LastChange
S&P futures4,1911.8
Oil (WTI)65.73-0.47
10 year government bond yield 1.61%
30 year fixed rate mortgage 3.13%

Stocks are flattish this morning on no real news. Bonds and MBS are down.

The second estimate for Q1 GDP was unchanged at 6.4%. On the other hand, personal consumption was revised upward from 10.7% to 11.3%. The personal consumption expenditures index (the preferred inflation index by the Fed) rose 3.7% in the first quarter. Ex-food and energy, it rose 2.5%. This is above the Fed’s 2% target.

Corporate profits were flat in the first quarter. Note the stock market was up 9% over the quarter while the 10-year bond picked up 83 basis points in yield during the same period. The stock market looks like it is over its skis a little

Initial Jobless Claims came in at 406,000 last week. While the number is going in the right direction, it is still almost double where we were pre-COVID. These sorts of numbers were what we saw in the bad old days of 2009-2010

Durable goods orders fell 1.3% in April. Ex-transportation they rose 1%. Core capital goods (a proxy for business capital investment) rose 2.3%.

Luxury builder Toll Brothers reported a 21% increase in revenues in its second quarter earnings. EPS rose 71% while backlog hit a record. Higher input prices are evidently not a factor as gross margins increased and the company is guiding for them to increase further.

Newco-spelled-backwards bought a $48 billion servicing portfolio from Amerihome which was recently bought by Western Alliance.

Is real estate really an inflation hedge? Investors are piling into real estate right now, at least on the residential side. Academic studies have looked at the 1970s as kind of a test for this hypothesis. During the 70s, stocks languished while real estate rose in price. The big question however concerns rent growth and that is a tougher issue. Apartment REITs have struggled to raise rents over the past year, however that is certainly COVID-19 related.

The 1970s also corresponded to the baby-boom’s first housing purchases, while the inflation of the 1970s was pretty much unrelated to demographics (OPEC and declining productivity was the culprit in the 70s).

Investors IMO are buying SFR real estate because the cap rates (mid-single digits) are attractive enough in this low interest rate environment, and when you add in double-digit home price appreciation, you have an outsized return compared to the other asset classes out there. Multi-fam is probably less attractive, given the current political environment.

9 Responses

  1. @ Brent:

    I think we will have to wait on the fate of the proposed tax code revisions to fully assess the SF residential market as an investment. For example, the CG rate proposal out of Sanders’ version of the bill would be a monster.

    Like

    • rown doesn’t plan on filing charges against the kids, who he says acted out of desperation, Atlanta’s WSB-TV reported.

      “This is a generational poverty issue. These kids, it’s 12:30 in the afternoon. Why aren’t they in school? Why aren’t we enforcing systems to ensure that if they are not in school, they’re in recreational centers?” he said.

      Enforced by whom?

      Like

  2. This editorial is in the Wall Street Journal.

    The solution to ransomware is to outlaw cryptocurrency.

    Which is like saying the solution to kidnapping for ransom money is to outlaw currency.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/ban-cryptocurrency-to-fight-ransomware-11621962831

    And the tagline is so focus-grouped, to me:

    The existence of bitcoin and the rest benefits nobody except criminals and speculators.

    The existence of freedom, the lack of a complete surveillance state, the existence of defense lawyers . . . all those things might benefit them, too? Should we outlaw those? What about computers? Can’t do ransomware without computers, so why not make them illegal?

    Jeeze louise.

    Like

    • It’s also misdirection. Getting rid of cryptocurrency doesn’t really solve the problem. It removes one enabling technology. There are multiple ways to harden systems against ransomware account and often the folks who get hit with ransomware are doing none of them, or very few of them. They often don’t update software. They often leave automatic updates on in their software (which, to be fair, is a default, but again–if you’re a multi-million dollar business, you should have a cybersecurity person and that person should do their job).

      Like

    • The government is very threatened by crypto.

      Like

    • The entire point of cryptocurrency is that the government can’t outlaw it.

      Like

  3. Good Article. Informative Read.

    Like

Be kind, show respect, and all will be right with the world.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: