Morning Report: Personal Incomes rise

Posted on September 27, 2019 by Brent Nyitray

Vital Statistics:

 

Last Change
S&P futures 2989 8.25
Oil (WTI) 55.35 -1.24
10 year government bond yield 1.70%
30 year fixed rate mortgage 3.95%

 

Stocks are up this morning on no real news. Bonds and MBS are down.

 

Personal incomes rose 0.4% in August, while personal consumption rose 0.1%. Income surprised to the upside, while spending disappointed. Inflation remains within the Fed’s target, with the core PCE index rising 0.1% MOM and 1.8% YOY. The headline PCE, which includes food and energy, was flat MOM and up 1.4% YOY. Wages and salaries were up 0.6% MOM and up 4.8% YOY. Given that inflation is running below 2%, we are seeing real wage growth.

 

Durable goods orders rose as well, increasing 0.2%, while the Street was looking for a decrease of 1%. Ex-transportation they were up 0.5%, again above expectations. Business capital expenditures disappointed, however falling 0.2%.

 

Pending home sales rose 1.6% in August, according to NAR. “It is very encouraging that buyers are responding to exceptionally low interest rates,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist. “The notable sales slump in the West region over recent years appears to be over. Rising demand will reaccelerate home price appreciation in the absence of more supply.” The Western region was up 8% YOY as falling mortgage rates are improving affordability.

 

Millennials are continuing to leave the big cities, as they head to the suburbs to raise families (and also get priced out). New York City lost almost 38,000 young adults last year, which was twice the decline it had seen in the previous few years. When the Millennials were younger, urban walkable environments were all the rage and many in the industry thought this time was different. It wasn’t. The Millennial generation is getting married later and having kids later, but it seems like they are going for the same thing every generation prior to them wanted: space, good schools, etc. This is good news for the builders at the lower price points. Take a look at PulteGroup’s chart below.

 

pulte

 

The IPO market is still broken. Peloton was the most recent IPO to break price on the open. “Break Price” means to trade below the IPO price. It opened around $27 versus an IPO price of $29. This won’t help We Work’s IPO which is looking like an absolute dumpster fire as the price keeps getting cut. Historically, IPOs would trade at substantial premiums to their offering price, but those days are over. This represents the change in who pays the bills for investment banks, from the buy side to issuers.

Filed under: Economy, Morning Report |

« »

62 Responses

  1. Let the mutherfuker burn!, on September 27, 2019 at 10:09 am said:

    Gasp!

    How dare he!

    Impeach!!

    Like

    Reply
    • Brent Nyitray, on September 27, 2019 at 10:48 am said:

      How dare he defend himself against CIA moles out to take him down.

      Like

      Reply
    • jnc4p, on September 27, 2019 at 11:26 am said:

      It’s hard to think of a phrase that has less credibility with me these days in a news article, than “Experts say” without citing who the actual supposed experts are.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      • Brent Nyitray, on September 27, 2019 at 11:27 am said:

        well they are experts in feeding the narrative the left wants to hear.

        Like

        Reply
      • Kevin S. Willis, on September 27, 2019 at 12:09 pm said:

        “Experts say” is meaningless. It’s an effort to add credibility where there is no credibility. A specific person with a particular pedigree and background can say something that happens within their field, and if that’s what’s actually happening, that’s how the information should be imparted.

        But the person should also be identified, as that would allow other people to judge their biases. Without that identification, what they say is no more relevant or useful than anything anybody else has to say.

        “Experts say” is often used when talking about big, complicated issues with a lot of unknowns where “expertise” makes them no more likely to be accurate than a blind guess. You may be a meteorological expert but you can’t tell me if it’s going to rain at 5 PM on Tuesday next week. Because no matter how expert you are, you just can’t know. And that’s in a field that is based on improving accuracy.

        And these “experts” are often doing nothing more than giving their opinion, and their “expertise” makes their opinions no better than anybody else’s.

        … And the example above begs a lot of questions. There would need to be a lot more explaining as to how the president of the country using a system to keep secure records of his conversations “poses national security risks”.

        Like

        Reply
    • Kevin S. Willis, on September 27, 2019 at 12:00 pm said:

      Trump started using tools available to him to work towards accomplishing legitimate management goals. Other presidents hadn’t used these tools in these ways, so he should be impeached.

      There’s a little of the “all previous presidents used tissue from the long rectangular box. Trump has demanded the little square boxes. And this tissues with lotion in them! If this doesn’t rise to the level of an impeachable offense, I do not know what does!!!”

      Like

      Reply
  2. Let the mutherfuker burn!, on September 27, 2019 at 11:09 am said:

    Counter Narrative! Counter Narrative!

    I feel sorry for this dumb bastard. Knowing the NYT his days are numbered. The readers will want his scalp.

    Like

    Reply
    • Brent Nyitray, on September 27, 2019 at 11:54 am said:

      sniff…People don’t take our hysteria seriously… come on guys…

      Like

      Reply
    • Kevin S. Willis, on September 27, 2019 at 12:20 pm said:

      Big font, double-decker headlines, homepage takeovers: It’s been a big week in the news business for visual devices like these.

      Not here. And how many people have actually seen a newspaper headline this week, in a given week? I saw two of the thin newsletters that pass for a local paper here this week, and haven’t really seen that.

      This guy is living in the pass. Memphis and what point supported to major papers and several smaller, independent papers. Now we can’t support one paper. They are dinosaurs, and in more ways that one.

      You have newspapers because it was a way to aggregate news for the community. They no longer serve a purpose. But like television news eventually killed off the number-two papers in a lot of towns (there is certainly a correlation between the end of the Press Scimitar here the number of households with one and more-than-one television–and cable news killed it completely) the internet and all it has wrought in terms of online news, podcasts, information sharing, news aggregation, etc–it’s killed the printed paper. Nobody cares about double-decker headlines and homepage takeovers. That is an artifact of an era when newspaper journalists used to be relevant.

      Like

      Reply
    • Kevin S. Willis, on September 27, 2019 at 12:30 pm said:

      It took a little more than a year from that night until February 1999, when Clinton survived his impeachment by the House with a mostly party-line vote acquittal at a Senate trial. In retrospect, it seems clear what a critical moment of transition the Clinton impeachment — for that matter, the entire Clinton presidency — was in the journey to Nutsville.

      I agree with that. The GOP’s nonsense (my opinion) impeachment of Clinton helped get us to this point. Not that it wouldn’t have happened anyway, and not that how the congressional Democrats had managed 40 years of single-party rule didn’t play a huge role . . . but that was a “tipping point”.

      These days, with social media, everyone if they wish at any hour of the day can revel in the rubble of the old MSM filter.

      Sounds like the real problem here is that the media can no longer act as gatekeepers of information, and no longer have their birthright role of telling the hoi poloi what to think.

      The Clinton impeachment was about sex; the Trump impeachment is about whether a president abused his position as head of state.

      Which is essentially a lie, and I’m not sure that the author doesn’t know it’s a lie. I think he might. And you want to know why you guys aren’t the gatekeepers of information anymore, this is why. The Trump impeachment, like the Clinton impeachment, is about ideology and partisanship and trying to game the system to void the results of democratic elections.

      By the author’s standard, the Clinton impeachment was about lying under oat and fraudulent actions as governor of Arkansas, not sex. While Trump’s impeachment is, from what I can gather, about whether or not he’s violated campaign finance laws.

      Trump, by contrast, this week called Democrats “pirates” and the Ukraine investigation “a disgrace to our country” and “another witch hunt.”

      And the problem, as it so often does, seems to be rooted in the “common man” and “blustery douchebag” way Trump expresses himself.

      Like

      Reply
  4. Brent Nyitray, on September 27, 2019 at 12:22 pm said:

    The most Westchester thread ever is the one on my Facebook feed concerning the name of the John Jay Indians high school.

    So much virtue signalling it looks like the Chicago Board of Trade soybean pit ahead of an earlier-than-expected killing frost.

    Like

    Reply
  6. Brent Nyitray, on September 27, 2019 at 2:04 pm said:

    has anyone seen poll numbers on this whole kerfuffle? Not seeing many reported in the press, so the left must not be getting much traction…

    Like

    Reply
  7. novahockey, on September 27, 2019 at 2:38 pm said:

    https://apnews.com/de789d3d5f204adb8f05b852e6de50f6

    again, they got greedy. don’t bill so much and this flies through

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • Kevin S. Willis, on September 27, 2019 at 6:43 pm said:

      A previous version of the whistleblower complaint document, which the ICIG and DNI until recently provided to potential whistleblowers, declared that any complaint must contain only first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing and that complaints that provide only hearsay, rumor, or gossip would be rejected.

      This seems to me to be a much better standard. Yet another way Trump is lowering the standards . . . or the Deep State is lowering standards because of Trump. Either or.

      The complainant also cites publicly available news articles as proof of many of the allegations.

      I think that points to it clearly being political strategery rather than legitimate “whistleblowing”. It’s “throwing the kitchen sink” at the argument–not actually “whistleblowing” when you start quoting publicly available sources and the media. That’s the behavior of someone trying to make a case and prosecute, not just blow the whistle on inappropriate actions they heard about from a friend who heard about it from a friend who heard it from another Trump was messing around.

      The anti-Trump complaint also made several false claims that have been directly refuted and debunked. While the complaint alleged that Trump demanded that Ukraine physically return multiple servers potentially related to ongoing investigations of foreign interference in the 2016 elections, the transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky shows that such a request was never made.

      That’s the DNC’s hacked servers that–having found out they’d been hacked, the DNC sent them to Crowdstrike (which is a Ukranian company or something? Is that real?) instead of, you know, the FBI–but nothing to see there folks, move along. Anyway, what in the heck would be wrong with him demanding the return of those servers? Why weren’t they given to the FBI in the first place?

      Reached by phone on Friday afternoon, a Director of National Intelligence official refused to comment on any questions about the secret revision to the whistleblower form, including when it was revised to eliminate the requirement of first-hand knowledge and for what reason.

      The deep state is going to deep state.

      Like

      Reply
    • novahockey, on October 1, 2019 at 11:00 am said:

      I have a good friend with a son at that school.

      Like

      Reply
      • jnc4p, on October 1, 2019 at 11:27 am said:

        The key was using the incident to tar the school as tied to Pence because his wife teaches there full time.

        I actually don’t blame the girl. This is a result of the current state of affairs where the kids know that claims like hers can be easily weaponized in today’s media environment. If you are in a school yard fight, you grab everything handy.

        Adults don’t do the due diligence before acting on these or reporting them to the media. That’s where the primary failure lies. Sort of like leaving a loaded gun lying around the house and being surprised when the kid picks it up.

        Fortunately that’s offset by today’s surveillance culture where the accused could ask that the camera footage be pulled. Because they certainly weren’t going to be considered innocent until proven guilty.

        Proactive defense is the rule of the day, hence the Pence rule. Anyone can be accused of anything at any time.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply
    • Brent Nyitray, on October 1, 2019 at 11:21 am said:

      You would think if the US was as irredeemably racist as the left believes, they wouldn’t have to invent hate crimes….

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
      • Kevin S. Willis, on October 1, 2019 at 12:24 pm said:

        The problem is the super-nutritive petri dish that belief creates–it provides so many incentives for people to fake hate crimes, and since the left celebrates victimhood–well, that’s another incentive. Because the debunking of faked hate crimes is so under-reported, and public skepticism of very fishy sounding hatecrimes, is not tolerated–it gives individuals the impression that faking a hatecrime is easy and will get them all sorts of attention and up their victim-cred, etc.

        Like

        Reply
    • Kevin S. Willis, on October 1, 2019 at 12:19 pm said:

      we also feel tremendous pain for the victims and the hurt on both sides of this conflict.

      Who was hurt on the false-accuser side and how?

      I wondered why this story was in WaPo and the NYT and I’m thinking maybe it was to provide the NAACP spin, as it’s getting the point to where just ignoring fake hate crimes doesn’t work:

      “Too often in these rare instances of fabricated hate crimes, critics use a broad brush to claim racially motivated crimes are virtually non-existent,” the organization stated. “This is demonstrably wrong. Data from numerous sources, including the Anti-Defamation League, the FBI, and the Justice Department, shows bias motivated crimes are on the rise, year over year.”

      Still, they didn’t lead with the spin. Maybe white lefties and males generally (depending on the hate crime) are beginning to realize this can just be as easily weaponized against them?

      Also: rare instances? By some counts I think it could be said fake hate crimes outnumber real ones, especially ones that seem very unlikely to any thinking person but the perp isn’t caught. Because in some many of those, if the perp ever is caught . . . turns out it was fake.

      Like

      Reply
      • jnc4p, on October 1, 2019 at 1:04 pm said:

        “Who was hurt on the false-accuser side and how? ”

        The reporting was that the girl was still bullied, but it wasn’t to the extent that it was reported, i.e. with the racial aspect.

        Like

        Reply
      • jnc4p, on October 1, 2019 at 1:16 pm said:

        “I wondered why this story was in WaPo and the NYT”

        The connection to Pence via his wife teaching at the school.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply
        • Kevin S. Willis, on October 1, 2019 at 9:31 pm said:

          But is that why the wrote the article acknowledging the hate crime aspect was fake? I can get why they were covering it when they thought it had to real because of course Pence’s wife works at a racist school. But the reveal that it was once again one of those so rare it never happens fake hate crimes is the thing I’m surprised they covered at all. “There’s bigger news!”

          Like

        • jnc4p, on October 2, 2019 at 9:41 am said:

          Local media reported that it was fake and the national media knew that they would be easily open to accusations of bias if they didn’t follow up on their own pieces to acknowledge that.

          Like

Be kind, show respect, and all will be right with the world.