Morning Report – The Bernank speaks at 10:00 EST 05/22/13

Vital Statistics:

  Last Change Percent
S&P Futures  1669.5 3.9 0.23%
Eurostoxx Index 2817.3 -4.3 -0.15%
Oil (WTI) 95.92 -0.3 -0.27%
LIBOR 0.274 0.000 -0.13%
US Dollar Index (DXY) 83.91 0.044 0.05%
10 Year Govt Bond Yield 1.93% 0.01%  
Current Coupon Ginnie Mae TBA 104.2 0.1  
Current Coupon Fannie Mae TBA 102.8 0.0  
RPX Composite Real Estate Index 199 0.2  
BankRate 30 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage 3.65    

 

Markets are up again on no real news. Bonds and MBS are more or less flat
 
Mortgage Applications fell 10% last week as the recent rise in interest rates has taken its toll. The refi index was down 12% while the purchase index was down 3%. It appears that the 10 year has found a level here, at least for the short term.
 
McMansion builder Toll Brothers (TOL) reported better than expected earnings this morning. Revenues increased 38%.  Contracts increased 57%. ASPs were up huge – 16%. Backlog was up 69%. Toll’s results more or less mirror what the other homebuilders have reported, although the growth was larger in the builders that focus on starter homes and first move-up buyers. 
 
We had a lot of Fed-speak over the past couple of days. New York Fed President William Dudley said that it will take 3 to 4 months to make a determination over whether the economy is strong enough to stand an end to QE. St. Louis Fed Head James Bullard also said that purchases should continue. The Fed is concerned about the sequester’s effect on the economy, which will mainly be felt over the summer. Finally, the Bernank is scheduled to testify before Congress at 10:00. The minutes of the April 30 meeting will also be released today. 
 
The New York Fed released its mortgage backed securities purchase advice recently. In spite of the hike in interest rates, the MBS purchases stayed the same:  3 million MBS a day, of which the lion’s share is conforming (something like 80%). You would think the Fed would be more aggressive when rates increase and back off when they fall, but that isn’t what they are doing. 
 
It looks like Mel Watt faces an uphill climb to confirmation. The choice is seen as 100% political, while most Republicans think we need a technocrat who understands finance. The fear is that the partisan wrangling and posturing over Watt will poison the well so much that any sort of bipartisan housing bill will be more or less impossible. Principal mods aside, that would probably mean the end of HARP 3.0 which would extend HARP eligibility to late 2009 and 2010 vintages.

25 Responses

  1. Markets are up again on no real news

    I can’t figure out when to get off the train.

    Like

  2. I thought this was an interesting investigation from propublica. They looked into the over prescribing of certain medications for seniors through Medicare Part D. This is something I worry about, not for myself personally because I tend to shy away from any and all drugs until I’ve done a lot of research myself, but for others. Apparently, no one’s really minding the store.

    But an investigation by ProPublica has found the program, in its drive to get drugs into patients’ hands, has failed to properly monitor safety. An analysis of four years of Medicare prescription records shows that some doctors and other health professionals across the country prescribe large quantities of drugs that are potentially harmful, disorienting or addictive. Federal officials have done little to detect or deter these hazardous prescribing patterns.

    Medicare has access to reams of data about its patients, their diagnoses and the medical services they received. It could analyze all of this information to determine whether patients are being prescribed appropriate drugs for their conditions.

    But officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services say the job of monitoring prescribing falls to the private health plans that administer the program, not the government. Congress never intended for CMS to second-guess doctors – and didn’t give it that authority, officials said.

    “CMS’s payments don’t go to physicians, don’t go to pharmacies. They go to plans, which is how our oversight framework has been established,” Jonathan Blum, the agency’s director of Medicare, said in an interview. The philosophy “really has been to defer to physicians” about whether a drug is medically necessary, he said.

    Asked repeatedly to cite which provision in the law limits their oversight of prescribers, CMS officials could not do so.

    The Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services has repeatedly criticized CMS for its failure to police the program, known as Part D. In report after report, the inspector general has advised CMS officials to be more vigilant. Yet the agency has rejected several key recommendations as unnecessary or overreaching.

    http://www.propublica.org/article/part-d-prescriber-checkup-mainbar

    Like

  3. CMS, is, however, tracking pain meds

    and a lot of work in that area is being done at the state and/or provider level. EHRs help with this.

    Click to access SE1250.pdf

    Like

  4. Thanks Nova, what’s an EHR though? I always thought my mother was over medicated and addicted as well. Every time I tried to broach the subject with her doctor however he seemed to not know how to remedy the situation. If she needs pain meds, she needs them…………………yikes. I remember she would get mad at me on those visits.

    Like

  5. electronic health record. aka, electronic medical record.
    it’s supposed to ping if there’s a medication issue. ideally, your doc will see what is already prescripted and act accordingly. that failing, the pharmacist should pick up on it.

    Like

  6. For MIchigoose – On PL last night you were arguing that Andrew Sullivan didn’t know what he was talking about with regards to genetics.

    In case you are unaware, James Watson also caused a controversy in 2008 when he made the same observations.

    Henry Louis Gates interviewed him afterwards about his views and published both the interview and a longer piece about his observations.

    http://www.theroot.com/views/color-controversy-and-dna

    http://www.theroot.com/views/science-racism

    Like

  7. Here is an interesting philosophical difference, I have zero trust in government officials using Medicare Part D Rx for anything useful. I believe the odds of something harmful coming out of their ability to analyze the data far outweighs anything useful.

    I know it sounds flippant and snotty, i’m not trying to be.

    Like

  8. I think Nova is probably correct that the monitoring is best done through electronic records. Hasn’t part d been a boondoggle from the beginning anyway?

    Like

  9. Part D has succeeded in getting drugs to seniors at low out of pocket cost. particularly those who do not qualify for Medicaid coverage. for others, it’s largely cost shifting. I think the only reason democrats don’t like it is because they didn’t do it first.

    the big issue is the non-interference clause, which prohibits HHS from negotiating for lower prices. the problem is that the gov does not negotiate. it sets prices. that said, there is plenty of negotiating going on in Part D.

    Like

  10. that said, there is plenty of negotiating going on in Part D

    What does that mean Nova? I thought the reason it wasn’t popular with some people is the way it added to the deficit. My husband signed up for it even though I didn’t think he needed to and once we figured it out…………….he’ll break even once he reaches his deductible and pays the premium. We don’t take many drugs although he takes more than I do…………….which is zero right now.

    Like

  11. the part D plans deal directly with the manufacturer and pharmacies.
    i’ll find a good 101 link for you

    Like

  12. I remember Watson’s comments, jnc, and disagreed with him at the time. I hadn’t seen the Gates pieces, so I’ll have to give them a read.

    Thanks!

    Like

  13. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/27/1/33.long

    one of the other tings with Part D is the classes of protected drugs. it’s tough for a plan to push for a discount if you’re required to carry a particular drug.

    Like

  14. From the above link:

    “”It was aggravating,” one administration official said. “It comes back to Kathryn Ruemmler, Kathyrn Ruemmler, Kathryn Ruemmler. I hate to say it, as it sounds like piling on, but it’s on her doorstep too.”

    Ruemmler has also come under fire this week for not making the president and others aware of the IRS investigation.”

    Pretty sure she killed Kennedy to, at least according to anonymous WH staffer Ben Rhodes.

    Like

    • McWing:

      Ruemmler has also come under fire this week for not making the president and others aware of the IRS investigation.

      I am reminded of an Obama campaign boast from 2008:

      I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m gonna think I’m a better political director than my political director.

      But he apparently knows less than anyone about what the agencies under his control are actually doing.

      Like

  15. Heh, in reference to above.

    “@iowahawkblog: After the WH’s anonymous back channel whisper campaign against Kathryn Ruemmler, I’m totally convinced they’d never abandon an ambassador.”

    Like

  16. Pretty sure she killed Kennedy

    At least they aren’t trying pin Vince Foster or any ambassadors to Libya on her.
    Corked by Troll above.

    Like

  17. My son works for a major EMR firm. They hire several dozen people a month.

    Like

  18. Guess we know what orders the Juiceboxer’s got.

    @McCormackJohn: Josh Marshall (10:15a.m.): Lerner Must Go http://t.co/E4UfxnXKR0 Ezra Klein (9:45a.m.): Heads should roll at IRS http://t.co/VQR0bf8CWC

    Sargent must be fuming. Didn’t Brock say he’d write anything?

    Like

    • McWing:

      Sargent must be fuming.

      Greg wasn’t part of the loyal contingent invited to the West Wing yesterday? No respect.

      Like

  19. Wow! That’s quite an admission from the NYT.

    “In the same week, Rush Limbaugh, the conservative icon and radio host, called a Georgetown University law student, Sandra Fluke, a “slut” for her comments about the availability of birth control. The fallout from that consumed Washington, and Mr. Obama eventually called Ms. Fluke.”

    Like

  20. Looks like the count is four now, but the administration claims three were mistakes:

    “In a First, U.S. Admits Drones Have Killed 4 Americans
    By CHARLIE SAVAGE
    Published: May 22, 2013

    WASHINGTON — One day before President Obama is due to deliver a major speech on national security, his administration on Wednesday formally acknowledged that the United States had killed four American citizens in drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan.

    The letter also said that the United States had killed three other Americans: Samir Khan, who was killed in the same strike; Mr. Awlaki’s son Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, who was also killed in Yemen; and Jude Mohammed, who was killed in a strike in Pakistan.

    “These individuals were not specifically targeted by the United States,” Mr. Holder wrote. ”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/us/us-acknowledges-killing-4-americans-in-drone-strikes.html?hp

    Like

  21. they didn’t mean it? need moar peace prize.

    Like

  22. Do we still have to pay 80 gajillian dollars to insure universal access to computers for kids?

    http://m.nber.org/papers/w19060

    Like

Leave a reply to Michigoose Cancel reply