A post by Eugene Volokh on VC talks about a recent jury award under the CA public accommodations anti-discrimination statute against a (Muslim) hotel owner that kicked out a Friends of the IDF gathering. I think the major issue is whether property owners are free to discriminate on the basis of non-religious (or religious) beliefs. A secondary issue is whether property owners can discriminate on the basis of speech (Note: it is not clear to me whether the Friends of the IDF gathering was just a party or a fundraiser with speeches, etc.).
The link to the LA Times article has a little more information on the background.
So, an additional question is: should we have different rules for property owners in different states? Volokh makes it sound as if this result is specific to CA.
Filed under: First Amendment, law | 50 Comments »