Case-Schiller

August Case-Schiller came in at 142.84, down 3.8% from a year ago. Home prices are back to Summer 2003 levels. Certainly the chart gives no indication of gathering strength, if anything it looks like we have had a meager (at best) dead cat bounce off the bottom, and are now in a decling channel with lower highs and lower lows. Detroit and Washington DC were the only MSAs that were up while the worst performers were Portland, Phoenix, and Minneapolis. June and July numbers were revised down as well.

Certainly there is nothing to indicate strength in the housing market. We are going into a seasonally weak period and the consumer is in a foul mood as evidenced by the Conference Board Consumer Confidence reading of 39.8, which takes us back to late 08 / early 09 levels.

Obama’s new housing plan will probably be as successful as his earlier ones at stanching the decline in the housing market. It may help a few marginal homeowners stay in their home, but it isn’t going to do anything for troubled homeowners as they have to be current in their payments to refinance. As I discussed before, we have a demographic issue here, with the older first time buyer prematurely entering the market and the younger first time homebuyer not in a position to buy. That leaves the professionals, and they aren’t going to get interested in housing until prices are dirt cheap and we are not there yet. Against that, we have an army of baby boomers who need to downsize empty nests, or simply bought too much home and need to get out. The government is probably powerless to change this dynamic – all they can do is try and redistribute the losses.

Chart: Case-Schiller:

A Labor Law Case the DC Circuit got Very Wrong

In  IUOE, Local 513 v. NLRB, 635 F.3d 1233,  the Court stated the facts as follows:

Overton, one morning, noticed that a piece of machinery was not properly deployed (an outrigger was not fully extended), which was a safety violation. Ozark’s safety rules — which are incorporated into the National Maintenance Agreement — oblige any employee to report to a supervisor safety violations. Indeed, an employee who does not do so is subject to discipline. Overton did report the safety violation  [***3] and sought to determine who was responsible. After an investigation, another employee and Local 513 member was suspended for three days.

That led the union’s business agent to file charges against Overton for gross disloyalty and conduct unbecoming a union member. (Apparently the union also objected to Overton’s desire to bring in other experienced operating engineers rather than train the union’s members.) The union fined Overton $2,500, which prompted Ozark to file an unfair labor practice charge against the union. The Board’s general counsel issued a complaint alleging that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A). HN1That section precludes a union from “restrain[ing] or coerc[ing]” an employee in the exercise of his section 7 rights, with the proviso that a union may continue to “prescribe its own rules with respect to the acquisition or retention of membership therein.” 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(A). And section 7 protects an employee’s right to “to engage in . . . concerted activities” [or] “. . . to refrain from . . . such.” Id. § 157.

****
From this background, the case proceeded not on section 7, but on 8(b)(1)(A) grounds.  The NLRB has held for thirty years that  a union violates that provision if a union disciplines an employee member for reporting a safety violation, which he has a duty to report.  The DC Court says that without tying this to section 7 rights the NLRB cannot keep a union from disciplining a member for reporting a safety violation he is under a valid duty to report.  

We are thus on the brink of creating a union workplace where an individual employee dare not report a safety violation he is under a duty to report, save through the channel of his union foreman.  I think this is messy and bad, and may take the Supremes to reverse.

GAO on Health Care Price Transparency

GAO is out with a report on the difficulty of making health care pricing transparent to consumers. I haven’t ready it yet, but I know this is of interest to several of you, so I’d thought I’d pass it along. I also know I’m way late on a MedPAC post, which I’m working on simultaneously with my client work.

GAO Report on Health Care Price Transparency

Bits & Pieces (Monday Evening Slog)

Ugh. What a day. One of those days where nothing gets resolved but I can continue to see all the things that are unresolved hovering over my head. Although they are mostly 3rd world problems, most of them stem from a mistake or decision I made previously, and I hate that. I always have that sense that somehow I have an obligation to do things differently in the past, but I can’t do it.It’s like those dreams where you’re running through molasses. Nothing a big, fat check from the government wouldn’t solve. I’m just saying, NoVA. 😉 
 …
  
As you may know, I’m a Disney fan. And I always hope they hit it out of the park, and create another classic, each time they make another movie. There are a few movies I felt were classics from the first time I saw them, like Beauty and the Beast. But I had good feelings about that one from the minute I first saw the poster art and theater standees. I think I got that vibe from The Little Mermaid, as well. I knew when I saw it, or shortly after, that it was a very good movie. I believe we had rented it on VHS and I was watching it with a little group of college friends when one of them said: “It’s like an instant Disney classic!”, and I realized that I agreed.

I think Tangled belongs in that group of Disney classics. After films that I enjoyed but didn’t feel weren’t classics in the manner of Beauty and the Beast, such as The Frog Princess, and one’s that were good but weren’t really classic Disney, like Bolt, my expectations were tempered. I came out of my first viewing, thinking they had pulled it off, but not really considering it an instant classic.

After having watched it several times now, and seeing both my daughters (one 6 and one 13) watch it several more times, I’m convinced it’s a classic, and one that will build an even bigger following over time. It’s a great re-telling of the Rapunzel tale, has some great set pieces, great performances, and classic Disney musical numbers.

Another indicator for me: Tangled is the first Disney Soundtrack I’ve purchased since The Nightmare Before Christmas. Before that, it was The Little Mermaid.

I had originally planned to discuss my deep love of certain movies, and my ability to watch them over and over again, such as It’s a Wonderful Life. It’s been a crazy day, so some other time.

My favorite scene:

Some days I feel a whole lot like George Bailey at 0:56.

— KW

This is not lobbying

Taking advantage of the pension system

I’m quoting liberally here from the story:

Two lobbyists with no prior teaching experience were allowed to count their years as union employees toward a state teacher pension once they served a single day of subbing in 2007, a Tribune/WGN-TV investigation has found ….. The legislation enabled union officials to get into the state teachers pension fund and count their previous years as union employees after quickly obtaining teaching certificates and working in a classroom. They just had to do it before the bill was signed into law.

… His pay for one day as a substitute was $93, according to records of the Illinois Teachers Retirement System … based on his salary history so far, he could earn a pension of about $108,000 a year, more than double what the average teacher receives …. stand to receive more than a million dollars each from a state pension fund …. A spokesman for the Illinois Federation of Teachers emphasized that the lobbyists’ actions were legal and that they made “individual decisions.”

End quote.

Here are two guys who clearly took advantage of a situation. What I don’t get is the defense from the union. The tone-deafness of that quote is astounding to me.

Morning Report

Vital Statistics:

Last Change Percent
S&P Futures 1238 2.8 0.23%
Eurostoxx Index 2337.8 0.280 0.01%
Oil (WTI) 88.04 0.640 0.73%
US Dollar Index (DXY) 76.438 0.043 0.06%
10 Year Govt Bond Yield 2.21% -0.01%

Futures are flat this morning as the market waits to see what comes out of Europe. The WSJ has a story this morning about the brightening outlook for Corporate America. It raises an interesting point regarding consumers – what they actually do can be different from what they say. Consumers can feel tapped out and miserable, but when the 10-year old car has had it, they buy a new one. Consumption can only be deferred for so long, and we have had a retrenching consumer for 3 years now.

The Obama administration is working on a new housing plan – one which eases the requirements for refinancing. Credit is so tight right now that borrowers who are current but have little or no equity are unable to refinance. This move is intended to break that dynamic. Will it prevent home prices from dropping? Probably not, as the first-time homebuyer is not really in a position to buy a house, and prices aren’t cheap enough to entice professional investors to take the liquidity risk and step into the market.

Merger Monday is back upon us with a bear hug in the pipeline space and a deal in the cloud computing space. CAT reported better than expected earnings.

No major economic data today – Case-Schiller comes out tomorrow.

ATiM Can Be Proud

The other day lms pointed out that an unknown person named “Kite” had become a “Follower” of our little blog here (see the list of avatars in the sidebar). I was curious, so I chased him down to ask how he had discovered us. Apparently there is some application out there called Stumbleupon which somehow tracks your own interests and recommends sites that you may find interesting. One of our own blog posts turned up in Kite’s stumbleupon, and he thought it interesting enough to start to follow us. But what I really wanted to pass on about his response to me was this:

Not really much intent to post with anything resembling consistency, but your blog is an interesting read. One of the few times I’ve ever read a political blog that wasn’t a shouting matching within five posts.

Hey…that’s what we were trying to do! Nice to have an outside observer confirm that we have achieved some measure of success. Well done, all.

Is a Rise in Income Inequality a Myth?

Here’s an interesting article by Jim Pethokoukis (formerly of Reuters, now with AEI) in which he states that there really is no increase in income inequality.
I’ve clipped this portion in honor of Kevin,
“4. A 2010 study by the University of Chicago’s Bruce Meyer and Notre Dame’s James Sullivan notes that official income inequality statistics indicate a sharp rise in inequality over the past four decades: “The ratio of the 90th to the 10th percentile of income, for example, grew by 23 percent between 1970 and 2008.” But Meyer and Sullivan point out that income statistics miss a lot, such as the value of government programs and the impact of taxes. The latter, especially, is a biggie. The researchers find that “accounting for taxes considerably reduces the rise in income inequality” over the past 45 years. In addition, “consumption inequality is less pronounced than income inequality.””
Food for thought in the current OWS environment.
—Troll

Bits & Pieces (TGIF Edition)

Can’t embed it, but I do recommend Full Metal Disney. Very strange, but well-executed.

If you’re not listening to the My History Can Beat up Your Politics by Bruce Carlson, you’re making a profound error. Here, he discusses the effectiveness of stimulus spending in a historical context.

He quotes Herbert Hoover as saying: “No one is starving. The hobo eats better than ever before.”

That Herbert Hoover was a man after my own heart. If you’ve never read it, you should consult John Hodgman’s Compleat List of Hobo Names. Myself, I am partial to Chicken Nugget Will and Persuasive Fredrick. And Cthulhu Carl. Then, you too, will be an expert on hobos.

Steve Jobs new biography includes a bit on warning Obama that he was going to be a one-term president. It also included the interesting observation that it’s too damned hard to build factories in America, while it’s easy to do in China.

Louisiana law bans cash transactions for second hand goods. Holy crap, why does every politician want to make me a frothing-at-the-mouth libertarian?

According to The Transom, David Frum is not a serious person. You have to scroll down to read it. But it’s there.

 — KW



It’s all gonna be OK

A sure sign that home prices have stopped falling:

A San Francisco insurer will roll out coverage against falling housing values in Ohio, the first state where it is selling policies for owners of single-family houses and condos.

Home Value Insurance Co. will use calculations by the Case-Shiller Home Price Index to decide payouts if homeowner policyholders sell their houses below the insured values. The company, founded in 2009 and headed by former investment banker Scott Ryles, will sell its Home Value Protection policies through independent agents.