Vital Statistics:
| Last | Change | Percent | |
| S&P Futures | 1271.2 | -1.9 | -0.15% |
| Eurostoxx Index | 2324.9 | 9.180 | 0.40% |
| Oil (WTI) | 101.26 | -0.550 | -0.54% |
| US Dollar Index (DXY) | 81.197 | 0.276 | 0.34% |
| US 10 Year Yield | 1.97% | -0.03% | |
| Italy 10 Year Yield | 7.13% | 0.04% |
Jobs Friday. Yesterday’s ADP report did indeed signal a stronger jobs report today. Nonfarm payrolls were up 200k, and Nov was revised down. The unemployment rate dropped to 8.5% from 8.7%. Manufacturing was up 23k, and construction was up 17k. On the service side, retailwas up 28k and transport was up 50k. This could be temp jobs related to the holidays, so take the report with a grain of salt when trying to draw conclusions for the economy as a whole.
I think Scott posted something from James Pethokoukis yesterday regarding Obama’s plan to have the GSEs refinance everyone who is current in their mortgage, no questions asked. The hitch in this plan is the originator. Anyone who originates a conforming mortgage for the GSEs has what is called put-back risk. In other words, if it turns out that the originator had done a poor underwriting, the GSE can force the underwriter to buy it back. And for that reason, no originator is going to refi underwater mortgages or people with dented credit. Even if Obama winks at the originators and says “don’t worry about put-back risk,” I doubt that would be enough comfort, since the rules can always be changed retroactively, and any banker with grey hair will remember the supervisory goodwill fiasco from the S&L crisis. Plus, what is the upside of refinancing an underwater loan for 4.2%? The same as the upside of refinancing a 80% LTV loan for 4.2%. In other words, there is no compensation for taking Obama risk. Which is why it won’t have the effect he hopes it will.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 26 Comments »