Morning Report: Existing Home Sales Fall

Vital Statistics:

Stocks are lower this morning after lackluster earnings from Tesla. Bonds and MBS are flat.

Existing home sales fell 5.4% last month to a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 3.89 million. “We’re seeing a slow shift from a seller’s market to a buyer’s market,” said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. “Homes are sitting on the market a bit longer, and sellers are receiving fewer offers. More buyers are insisting on home inspections and appraisals, and inventory is definitively rising on a national basis. Even as the median home price reached a new record high, further large accelerations are unlikely,” Yun added. “Supply and demand dynamics are nearing a balanced market condition. The months supply of inventory reached its highest level in more than four years.”

The median home price rose to 426,900, which was a 4.1% increase from a year ago. The first time homebuyer share fell from 31% to 29%, while investor purchases fell from 18% to 16%. The 3.9 million pace of existing home sales is pretty consistent for a housing recession. To put that number into perspective, we did something like 5.3 million in 2019.

Fannie Mae’s latest housing forecast is out. They see the 30 year fixed rate mortgage ending the year at 6.7%, and gradually falling to 6.2% by the end of 2025. Home price appreciation is expected to remain in the 6% range before falling into the 3% range in 2025. They expect to see 25 basis points in rate cuts this year and another 75 bp in 2025. The core PCE inflation rate is expected to fall to 2.7% this year and 2.3% next year.

PennyMac reported earnings that disappointed the Street. The company acquired $22.5 billion in loans in Q2, which was up 6% on a year-over-year basis. On the earnings conference call, CEO David Spector was asked about when we will start seeing more refi activity:

“Look, I think it’s a gradual decline down. I think if you look at originations post COVID, we kind of jumped and kind of ran through loans with 5% handle. And I think it’s really in the 6% to 7% range where you see a lot — and even north of 7%, where you see a lot of opportunity. It’s going to be — the way I think about it is it’s going to be the slow grind down. I think when rates get to 6.5%, that’s where it really picks up steam.

And I think at 6%, you’re in what I would deem a really robust refi market because it’s not just the existing first that are in the money. You could have loans that are 4% and 5%, taking out debt consolidation, cash refinance to either pay off existing HELOCs or closed-end seconds or other forms of debt. And so it’s really a function of what’s behind the first lien that helps drive the refinanceability. But I continue to believe that it’s 10-year around 3.75%, mortgage is down 50 basis points, that it really is to me, that’s the signal of a true new market or new phase of the refinanceability.”

Mortgage applications fell 2.2% last week as purchases fell 4% and refis rose 0.3%. “Mortgage rates continued to ease, with the 30-year fixed rate dipping to 6.82 percent, the lowest level since February 2024,” said Joel Kan, MBA’s Vice President and Deputy Chief Economist. “Refinance applications were up, driven by conventional and FHA application activity, as some borrowers took the opportunity to act. Furthermore, the conventional refi index was at its highest level since September 2022. Purchase applications decreased as ongoing affordability challenges persist with rates at their current levels and with home-price appreciation still strong in many markets.”

14 Responses

  1. Now that’s Democracy!

    Like

  2. Curious if anybody is going to ask him if dropping out is required to unite the party, what caused the disunity in the first place?

    https://x.com/theblaze/status/1816264581892956501?s=46&t=vSGsUlnc4rLxcUf7zfUiHg

    Like

      • This article interested me.

        https://reason.com/volokh/2024/07/29/venezuela-illustrates-the-perils-of-democratic-socialism/

        The article describes:

        the evils of state socialism in living color, and offers the suggestion that Trump-Vance are pushing a different yet similarly beleaguered cause, and sympathizes with Venezuelan emigrants.

        Like

        • Let’s see…the Democrats are the ones who conspired to change and manipulate the rules of an election in order to “fortify” it against their opponents; the Democrats are the ones who are attempting to imprison their primary political opponent; the Democrats are the ones who conspire with tech firms in order to censor their political opposition.

          But yeah, the modern Republican Party is definitely more akin to an authoritarian Democratic Socialist party than the Democrats. Lol.

          Like

        • There’s a lot to love about Reason, but their reflexive anti-trumpism isn’t one of them. It’s a pity really, because the piece accurately outlines the pitfalls of Socialism in a democratic country but then goes completely off the rails with endless “he could’s” as if there isn’t 4 years of history of Trump as POTUS not doing even one demagogueic action. It reads like the school newspaper kids sitting at a table in the lunchroom and thinking that their the cool kids.

          Like

        • Even if Trump implemented some sort of industrial policy it would be of a kind unlike anything any socialist or leftist would ever do. Meaning it might at least have some tangentially positive benefits, unlike any industrial policy that would ever be visited upon us by any other politician.

          Like

        • There are a lot of people with an astounding blind spot as to how the Democrats are conducting themselves. They extend a benefit of the doubt to the Democrats that Tucker Carlson would be embarrassed to extend to Trump.

          Like

        • Two points:

          “One traditional response to evidence that the USSR, communist China, and other communist states demonstrate that socialism leads to poverty and oppression.”

          I don’t think the USSR and China are comparable here, unless they view China after Deng Xiaoping as something other than communist.

          “Despite some ideological differences, the “national conservative” policies advocated by Trump, J.D. Vance, and others on the right, pose many of the same dangers as socialism—including the use of state control over the economy to suppress opposition.”

          Trying to get Disney to stop being woke (i.e. out of politics) isn’t the same as Venezuela. It’s a reaction to them getting involved in the first place. I wouldn’t adopt all the tactics that say De Santis has, but the comparison actually undermines the criticism.

          Like

        • I feel there is a qualitative difference between instituting price controls or mandating that farmers can’t plant acres of land or capping the number of doctors or engineers you allow to be produced and DeSantis revoking agreements that granted Disney special privileges as an acknowledgement Disney no longer represented the kind of positive public force that perhaps might have justified those privileges beyond the desire to bring in the promised initial economic development. Never really have had a problem with what DeSantis did there. In fact I really would not have had a problem with it even if it had not been punishment, but he had just done it because Universal and Sea World did not enjoy the same privileges. They said I’d rather see the government less involved in trying to outsmart the market.

          Like

        • Speaking of using the power of the state against your political opponents:

          https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/29/judge-bans-former-nra-head-wayne-lapierre-00171730

          Like

Be kind, show respect, and all will be right with the world.