Economics and ethics
Lying commies
The more people are exposed
to socialism, the worse they
behave
My other car is a Porsche“UNDER capitalism”, ran the old Soviet-era joke, “man exploits man. Under communism it is just the opposite.” In fact new research suggests that the Soviet system inspired not just sarcasm but cheating too: in East Germany, at least, communism appears to have inculcated moral laxity.
Lars Hornuf of the University of Munich and Dan Ariely, Ximena García-Rada and Heather Mann of Duke University ran an experiment last year to test Germans’ willingness to lie for personal gain. Some 250 Berliners were randomly selected to take part in a game where they could win up to €6 ($8).
The game was simple enough. Each participant was asked to throw a die 40 times and record each roll on a piece of paper. A higher overall tally earned a bigger payoff. Before each roll, players had to commit themselves to write down the number that was on either the top or the bottom side of the die. However, they did not have to tell anyone which side they had chosen, which made it easy to cheat by rolling the die first and then pretending that they had selected the side with the highest number. If they picked the top and then rolled a two, for example, they would have an incentive to claim—falsely—that they had chosen the bottom, which would be a five.
Honest participants would be expected to roll ones, twos and threes as often as fours, fives and sixes. But that did not happen: the sheets handed in had a suspiciously large share of high numbers, suggesting many players had cheated.
After finishing the game, the players had to fill in a form that asked their age and the part of Germany where they had lived in different decades. The authors found that, on average, those who had East German roots cheated twice as much as those who had grown up in West Germany under capitalism. They also looked at how much time people had spent in East Germany before the fall of the Berlin Wall. The longer the participants had been exposed to socialism, the greater the likelihood that they would claim improbable numbers of high rolls.
The study reveals nothing about the nature of the link between socialism and dishonesty. It might be a function of the relative poverty of East Germans, for example. All the same, when it comes to ethics, a capitalist upbringing appears to trump a socialist one.
Filed under: Open Thread | Tagged: Communists |
I think it would be fair to criticize the conclusion of this article by pointing out that it compares results for persons raised in a poor, communist, dictatorial, corrupt, police state with those raised in an emerging, dynamic, democratic, honest, welfare state. My guess is that the biggest difference in emotional culture is honest/hopeful vs. corrupt/cynical. East Germans were encouraged to report on their own families. Nothing could be more encouraging of nihilism than destruction of the family by suspicion.
But the experiment itself is interesting. I would like to see it performed on various self-identified groups, e.g., lawyers, CPAs, MDs,; poor people, rich people; etc.
The “Freakonomics” guys would do it in a minute.
FRIST.
LikeLike
It’s the basic foundation of economics: incentives. Individuals may have individual codes of morality, but those tend to at least have some flexibility in context, and in relation to our fellows.
A system that incentivizes laxity and cheating will produce more of it, because that’s where the incentives are. A system that incentivizes thrift and hard work will get more of that. Unfortunately, most systems that incentivize thrift involve economic crisis of some kind at some point (thus, why the Depression-era generation was always better at saving money, in aggregate, than Generation X).
A system that incentivizes individual achievement and attaches success and social status, to some degree, to said achievements will produce a more ethical populace than one that does the opposite. For a variety of reasons, capitalism must produce a more ethical society, and the more transparent the society is, the more incentives there are to be ethical: i.e., it’s difficult to achieve social status, respect, and wealth for any long period of time by robbing banks, and especially not by robbing old ladies. And many of the least ethical members of a capitalist society will be those who participate least in the capitalist system.
However, there will always be incentives to take short cuts. Some of these short cuts will be productive and innovative; many of them will be less-than-ethical cheats. So you won’t get a perfectly ethical system out of capitalism. But communism deplores individual success and achievement, thus providing individuals very little reason to behave ethically.
Recently watched a TED talk with Bill and Melinda Gates. Two of the wealthiest people in the world (Bill Gates and Warren Buffet) are devoting almost all their wealth to solving world problems. Yes, some of it is handouts, but a lot of it isn’t. I don’t know what they are doing to address the fundamental problem of 3rd world poverty (that is, the governments in the 3rd world that keep such nations in the 3rd world) but, still, I think it’s telling that two of the richest people in the world are devoting the bulk of their wealth to philanthropy . . . and Bill Gates noted that he had pledges from 150 other super wealthy people to put at least half their wealth into philanthropy.
Those damned .01 percenters! Curing malaria and other diseases and trying to provide clean water in impoverished nations and stuff!
LikeLike
@markinaustin: ” My guess is that the biggest difference in emotional culture is honest/hopeful vs. corrupt/cynical.”
I think this is fair, but . . . a communist country cannot be honest and hopeful (it can never be honest, and won’t be hopeful long). The incentives just aren’t there. Capitalism at least provides fertile ground for honest and hopeful cultures. Being a hardworking, reasonably honest, optimistic person can lead to great financial and social success in a capitalist nation. Communist? Not so much. Even China has gotten that message.
LikeLike
a communist country cannot be honest and hopeful (it can never be honest, and won’t be hopeful long
Absolutely proven. But the greater context of communism – beyond no private property – is dictatorship, no free speech or free press, no vote, internal spying…a terribly small perimeter of controlling outcomes in one’s life. Think of cheating as taking control unlawfully when no lawful method exists for taking control.
Communism: breeding desperation.
LikeLike
It’s weird that the Gated and Buffets don’t think the government isn’t the proper tool to fix the world.
LikeLike