It is time to revisit the Reapportionment Act of 1929. That law set the number of Representatives at 435 but did not restate the 1911 provision that districts be contiguous, compact, and equally populated. The Supreme Court eventually restored “equally populated” in the one-man one vote decisions which were key civil rights cases of the early 1960s, spearheaded by Alabama Attorney General Richmond Flowers. We have never come back to “contiguous (and) compact.”
435 was set as the number because of the size of the chamber. I suggest that limitation is a mere logistical issue that can be overcome in many ways that need not be addressed here.
Take the least populated state in each decennial census and give it one Rep. Then give other states multiples rounded up so that 1.51 WY in 2010 equals 2. Expand the House as necessary.
Done for 2010, the total membership of the HoR would now be 544. CA would have 66. TX would have 44. NY would have 34. FL would have 33. Make the mandate “contiguous and compact, leaving entire municipalities and entire counties within a single district wherever possible.”
Shake things up a bit. We might get Congress to actually support it because it makes for more Congressmen, each with somewhat more manageable districts for campaign purposes. Of course, it would effectively end the gerrymander.
Filed under: California, Congress, government dissatisfaction, TEXAS | 7 Comments »
