Legal news

An interesting case was argued at SCOTUS yesterday:

[I]n Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp[, t]he Justices will decide, once and for all, whether pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are “outside salesmen” and thus exempted from overtime-pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) The decision will also settle a circuit split between the Second and Ninth Circuits: the former held that PSRs are not outside salesmen and thus are not exempted from the FLSA’s requirement that they be paid overtime wages, while the Ninth Circuit (in this case) unanimously reached the contrary conclusion. This will be an interesting case with wide-ranging ramifications for the pharmaceutical industry and the ninety thousand people nationwide employed as PSRs.

Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp

Also, the en banc Ninth Circuit decided the AZ voter ID case:

We uphold Proposition 200’s requirement that voters show identification at the polling place, but conclude that the NVRA supersedes Proposition 200’s registration provision as that provision is applied to applicants using the National Mail Voter Registration Form (the “Federal Form”) to register to vote in federal elections. [NVRA = National Voter Registration Act — ed.]

Gonzalez v. AZ

3 Responses

  1. Having been, in another life, an SKF rep for 5 years, someone may owe me some sweet, sweet cheddar.

    Take that Jan Leshcly, you tennis playing freak!

    Like

  2. Troll:

    I was thinking of you when I read the opinion. Backpay for all the former and current PSRs would be a huge amount of money. But you might need to have documentation.

    SKF dates you, dude. It has been GSK for at least a decade now.

    Like

  3. I was there pre and post merger. Back before PhMRA, the salad days.

    Like

Be kind, show respect, and all will be right with the world.