Bits & Pieces (It’s Hump Day!)

What’s money really worth? The dollar value of the metal in coinage. 

Yes, McWing, I picked this up from Ace of Spades. How much does it cost to print a dollar bill, and how much of what is in circulation? There’s a lot in circulation, and in 2011 it costs about 9.1 cents per note.

***

IN 1974, K-Tel released a compilation album (both on vinyl and 8-Track) called Dynamic Sound. I’ve got a Spotify list that reconstructs that album’s playlist, but not the fade and ka-chunk of the 8-Track switching tracks (there is an iPod/iPhone app that I believe does this). You have to have Spotify to listen to it, however. I don’t pay for the mobile and other features, but the free account is teh awesome.

Why did I do that? Because K-Tel’s Dynamic Sound has never been available, since original release, yet I listened to that eight track a hundred times between ages 5 and 10. It, along with the soundtracks to the broadway musicals Hair and Jesus Christ: Superstar, were as formative as any of my other music. And my sister listened to it a lot, and I thought it might make a nice Christmas gift to put it altogether for her. It’s interesting to listen to something you heard a hundred times as a kid, but includes songs that I literally have not heard since 1978 or so.

If you’ve got Spotify, I also recommend Planet P’s 1931. It’s a concept album dealing with the rise of Hitler. And Tony Carey is an awesome song-writer.

***
The Plastic Billionaires do a lovely cover of Brian Eno’s “Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy)”. From their album Bankrupting Tiger Mountain (By Credit Default Swap). Which is, in fact, just a great cover album of Brian Eno’s 1974 classic. 

Do the Twins get SS Survivors’ Benefits? I Report, You Decide

Capato v. Commissioner was decided in favor of the twins in the Third Circuit and the Supremes have granted Certiorari.

This is again a case where science may be outrunning the law as written.  Here is what happened:  Mr. Capato was dying of cancer.  He and the Mrs. preserved his seed for later use.  He died.  She then conceived, 18 months after his death, by IVF, twins;  his biological children, no doubt.

On behalf of the twins, Mrs. C. filed for SS survivors’ bennies.
The claim was administratively rejected, then rejected by a USDC.
The 3d Circuit reversed and remanded for a fact finding.

This is a statutory, not a constitutional, case.   I believe the Supremes can reverse and render the Circuit, from my reading of the statute, and I am dubious as to the relevancy of the case law the Circuit cited.

The relevant part of the statute as quoted by the Circuit:

…the child (a) must have filed an application for benefits, (b) must be unmarried and less than eighteen years old (or an elementary or secondary school student under nineteen), and (c) must have been dependent upon the deceased individual at the time of his or her death. Id. §§ 402(d)(1)(A)-(C). [at p. 6].
************************************
The Circuit remanded to the District Court for a fact finding about dependency:

…are the undisputed biological children of a deceased wage earner and his widow children, within the meaning of the Act? The answer is a resounding ―Yes.‖ Accordingly, we will vacate the order of the District Court in part and remand for a determination of whether, as of the date of Mr. Capato‘s death, his children were dependent or deemed dependent on him, the final requisite of the Act remaining to be satisfied.6
********************************************

HOW can a fact finder deem the children conceived 18 mos. after his death to be dependent upon him at the time of his death, when they did not exist in any sense of the word?  Seems to me these twins are cut off as a matter of law.

This Court did seem to claim that these children were protected under a “liberal construction” of the law, and here that is not a political statement but a reference to a statute that is supposed to be interpreted liberally in favor of the beneficiary, in its own terms.  I quote:

The purpose of federal child insurance benefits is not to provide general welfare benefits, but to replace the support that the child would have received from his father had the father not died.  Jones ex rel. Jones v. Chater, 101 F.3d 509, 514 (7th Cir. 1996) (citing Mathews v. Lucas, 427 U.S. 495, 507-08 (1976)); see also Adams v. Weinberger, 521 F.2d 656, 659 (2d Cir. 1975) (the purpose of the Act is to provide support to children who have lost actual‖or anticipated‖ support). In general, the [Act] is to be accorded a liberal application in consonance with its remedial and humanitarian aims. Eisenhauer v. Mathews, 535 F.2d 681, 686 (2d Cir. 1976).
********************************************
To me, either they are protected under this liberal interpretation of the law as a matter of law, or they are not, as a matter of law.  I think they are not, but most important from my view is I do not think that there could be any relevant facts that bear on the decision.  It must be a matter of law, IMHO.

Ashot?  QB?  Any thoughts?  If the Supremes took this one, they must have something to say.

A Map of the Brain

Science is awesome. And our brains are complicated. And it’s amazing that we can think with this thing.

Morning Report

Vital Statistics:

Last Change Percent
S&P Futures 1250 -4.1 -0.33%
Eurostoxx Index 2263.9 9.850 0.44%
Oil (WTI) 101.91 2.540 2.56%
US Dollar Index (DXY) 77.974 0.042 0.05%
10 Year Govt Bond Yield 2.02% -0.02%

Euro sovereign yields are stable this morning, with Italy a little tighter and Spain a little wider. Oil is rallying on news that ConocoPhillips will reverse a pipeline which will move oil from the Central US to the Gulf Coast. There has been a glut of West Texas Intermediate in the central US, which has caused US oil (West Texas Intermediate) to trade at a substantial discount to International oil (North Sea Brent). At the moment, WTI is trading at 101.90 a barrel, up 2.50 vs Brent at 112.36 up 20 cents. Libya has also accounted for some of the premium as well, but the biggest driver is the absolute glut of oil in the central US.

In economic data we had the Consumer Price Index, Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization, and the NAHB Housing Market Index. All of these indices were net positives for the market, with the CPI indicating inflation remains under control, and industrial production, capacity utilization, and the NAHB index higher than expected. While these indices are still at soft levels, there is improvement, and the show that a double dip is not in the cards. While Europe is still the wild card, people are so pessimistic that the “black swan” may in fact be a garden-variety recession and not a financial catastrophe. Food for thought.

Bloomberg has a story about how there may end up being 200,000 job losses in the financial industry this year. It shows how utterly clueless the Occupy Wall Street people are. They imagine everybody is getting six and seven figure bonuses. Instead they are getting pink slips.
Business is terrible and people aren’t getting paid. The one thing OWS does not understand about the Street is that you eat what you kill. If you don’t generate revenue, you aren’t getting paid, no matter what fraternity you went to, who your parents are, etc. The fantasy that connected people are sitting on their duffs and making multimillion dollar bonuses is just that – a fantasy. Most senior people I know who lost jobs in 07-08 are still unemployed, even if they had nothing to do with subprime loans.

Chart: Capacity Utilization.

This chart gives a picture of how much slack there is in the manufacturing economy. Levels are back to the mid level of the 02-08 expansion, though less than the 90s. It certainly indicates that inflation will not be a problem, and that capital expenditures will be on hold for a while. Still, the trend is positive.

Time after Time

Anybody else a fan of the 1979 movie, Time After Time? A lovely, prim performance by Malcolm McDowell as H. G. Wells, David Warner as Jack the Ripper . . . and a lovely and young Mary Steenburgen. And it touches on the obduracy of time, the classic time travel trope where, no matter how hard you try (you time-travelling rapscallion, you), time does not want to be changed.
This is a clip from the movie. This (below) is the trailer, but trailers in 1979 were mostly appalling. It gives you no real sense of the movie, although perhaps does give you a sense of some of the over-enthusiastic music. 

If you’ve got the DVD subscription on NetFlix, they have it. You could do worse. 

Pre Morning Report-We’re Spending


I wrote a fatalistic comment yesterday that the only people who can save the economy of the US is the middle class. We’re the only substantial enough population to do it. In general, the uber wealthy have been fighting tooth and nail to protect their wealth. I believe it’s a little like cutting off their nose to spite their face but as someone who has never amassed great sums of wealth maybe I just don’t understand that need. I was born into the middle class and managed to hang onto that while putting five kids through college and living a well adjusted and happy life so I don’t think I’d want to trade places with them. Amassing huge sums of wealth was never a particular desire or fantasy for us.

I’m in favor of protecting the safety net but realize and accept that changes are coming which really means that myself and my friends will be spending more time in the trenches helping where we can to bridge the difference between minimal subsistence and something worse. Okay. I accept the fact that my grandchildren will have larger classes and more trouble finding colleges their parents can afford or that will accept them based on the need surpassing the availability. Luckily they’re smart kids and so are their parents, I’m pretty sure they’ll figure it out. There may not be as many manufacturing jobs for high school graduates but we still need plumbers and restaurant workers and eventually the construction industry will come back. And guess what the American consumer is already coming back, we’re spending our savings to do it, and Europe may bring us down yet, but for now demand is back. Good for us, we’re the heart of America. It’s not even a left right issue, it’s as American as apple pie.

Lots of good charts and cautionary tales at the link but I’m trying to look on the bright side.

Personal income growth is running at about 2% a year at best. Note as well that personal savings have begun to fall. Outside of cars and student loans, consumer credit has fallen in the last three months so I conclude that the current round of consumption is funded largely from a savings rundown, following the big spike post GFC. We’ve been here before, of course, and such cycles can run for longer than anyone expects so we can’t discount that possibility.