There’s a localish murder trial that’s been getting a lot of attention due to the nature of the crime and those involved.
Basically, an on-again, off-again relationship between two rich attractive UVA athletes ended with him beating her to death.
You can read about the trail here.
He was convicted of 2nd degree murder and I’m pissed about it. The jury decided that he didn’t mean to beat her to death. Just beat her. He received 25 years for the murder charge and 1 year for stealing her laptop after the fact. (I don’t remember why he did that). They opted for 2nd degree instead of 1st degree (life in prison) because of the intent. Granted, I was following this mostly through radio broadcast updates when the alarm when off in the morning or on the ride home from work, so I don’t know all the details. But my concern is more general anyway.
How is kicking in a door and beating your girlfriend to death, if you went there just to rough her up, any different that waiting for a shot at 500 yards with a scoped rifle?
In my opinion, there isn’t one. Not any meaningful one anyway. He wanted to hurt her and his actions resulted in her death. I don’t understand why his intent is somehow a mitigating factor. The intent was to cause harm.
I’m sure I’m missing something here.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 34 Comments »