Here is the first of what I hope to be a weekly post on Health Care. This will be largely oriented towards the legal side of the health care world because that is the information I get on a daily basis. But if anyone, especially, NoVa, wants to add links, please do so.
This is sort of not news because everyone knew it was going to to happen, but the scheduled 27% cut in Medicare fees for doctors is not going to happen. The “Doc Fix”, as it’s commonly known, is going to be part of the payroll tax deal. Maybe NoVa has heard differently, but I think hosptials and physicians know this dance can’t go on forever and that eventually reimbursement rates will be cut.
The administration was bragging about its success in fighting fraud. The DOJ attributes the success to city specific anti-fraud teams. As I’ve said before, a lot of the success is due to the spread of electronic health records.
This is a bit “inside baseball”, but CMS just issued a proposed rule regarding a provision in the ACA that requires providers to report overpayments within 60 days of “identifying” those overpayments. I don’t recommend reading the actual propose rule (unless you have trouble sleeping), but I mention this for several reason. First, it is a big deal for providers. Second, it’s an example of the (slow) legislative process. The ACA was passed 2 years ago and we are just now getting regulations on this aspect of the law. This is just the proposed rule after which people submit comments. After reviewing the comments, a final rule will be published. Lastly, it is an example of something posters have talked about here, where an unelected body (CMS) is, to a large extent, legislating. I don’t necessarily agree with some of the viewpoints expressed on that topic, but I think it can lead to an interesting discussion. [Also of note is the look-back period. CMS wants it to be 10 years, which is unheard of. Currently, CMS can reopen a claim within 1 year of payment for for any reason and within 4 years is “good cause” is shown – NoVA]
According to CMS and HHS 86 million Americans took advantage of the “free” preventative services required by the ACA. The quotes around free are mine since I’m pretty sure we’re paying for these one way or another. As NoVa has pointed out several times, there is also a question as to the efficacy of these preventative treatments.
Speaking of preventative care, at least one insurer is increasing reimbursement for primary care doctors. According to the article, the plan is supposed to pay for itself through decreased ER visits and hospital admissions.
This focus on preventative care is part of a broader trend towards ephasizing wellness. In addition to cheaper and more efficient treatment of chronic and acute conditions, hospitals and doctors are going to try and keep people healthy. Why? Because under payment models like Accountable Care Organizations, hospitals well earn money if they get you out of the hospital faster or prevent complications from arising once you are in the hospital. But they will earn even more money if you never come to the hospital or doctor. While it’s nice to see the current incentives (more care = more money) turned on their head, there still seems to be incentives (other than good health) for health care consumers to buy into this. As things stand, providers will laregely be held responsible for patient non-compliance. Needless to say, that is a concern for hospitals and doctors.
A couple more random links: The Washington Times demagogues the daylights out of ACOs. I could spend a long time pointing out the errors in that article. Meanwhile, Forbes talks about how private insurers are adopting some of the payment models in the ACA.
____________________________
An article from the New England Journal of Medicine about the new American College of Physicians ethics manual guidelines of “parsimonious care” and how that relates to health care costs.
— Mike
________________________________________
Here’s a link to the WSJ editorial QB referenced in his comment. I am familiar with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, but not at all familiar with this task force. While I’m unlikely to see it as the menace QB does, I do appreciate being made aware of it.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 30 Comments »

