Vital Statistics:
Last | Change | |
S&P futures | 3396 | -11.25 |
Oil (WTI) | 51.06 | -0.95 |
10 year government bond yield | 1.55% | |
30 year fixed rate mortgage | 3.69% |
Stocks are lower this morning after Apple warned that revenues will be light in Q1 based on Coronavirus issues. Bonds and MBS are up.
We have a lot of housing data this week, with the NAHB Housing Market Index, housing starts, and existing home sales. We also quite a bit of Fed-speak, but not much in the way of market-moving data.
New home purchase applications started off the year strong, rising 40% from December and 35% from a year ago. “New home applications and sales activity surged in January. This was a continuation of the end of 2019, which saw strong residential construction and increased purchase applications activity,” said Joel Kan, MBA Associate Vice President of Economic and Industry Forecasting. “Even with some global and domestic economic uncertainty, builders have ramped up production in recent months to meet increased homebuyer demand.” Strength in homebuilding may turn out to be the economic surprise of 2020.
Democratic hopeful Michael Bloomberg proposes tightening the regulatory grip on the financial industry, by imposing a 10 basis point financial transaction tax, merging Fannie and Freddie, banning payday lenders. and ending the use of mandatory arbitration. This is interesting since he was critical of Obama-era financial regulation when he was Mayor of NY.
Top fintech names which are changing the housing market.
Filed under: Economy, Morning Report |
WASHINGTON — Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York has qualified for Wednesday’s debate in Las Vegas, the first time the billionaire will appear onstage alongside his Democratic presidential rivals.
A national poll from NPR, PBS NewsHour and Marist released on Tuesday showed Mr. Bloomberg with 19 percent support among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, putting him in second place behind Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who had 31 percent. That was a substantial surge since the group’s poll in December, when Mr. Bloomberg received only 4 percent support.
LikeLike
lms:
I am really looking forward to see what the not insignificant Sanders/Socialist wing of the D party does when a capitalist pig gazillionaire “buys” the D nomination out from under him.
LikeLike
Read Glenn Greenwald’s Twitter feed for a preview of that. They aren’t going to accept it in the name of “party unity”, especially if Sanders goes into the convention with a plurality of votes.
I think this years awards for unintended consequences is going to go to the DNC for eliminating winner take all primaries.
LikeLike
And here’s where Warren and Sanders and Buttigieg start talking about Campaign Finance Reform! “We’ve got to protect our Democracy from billionaires buying our elections!”
LikeLike
It will be interesting tomorrow night to see how they face off with him I think.
LikeLike
This is pretty good too:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/02/mike-bloombergs-wit-and-wisdom
https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/the-portable-bloomberg-the-wit-wisdom-of-michael-bloomberg/ba5281b4-886d-42dc-a28d-e67eceb60719/
LikeLike
jnc:
This is pretty good too:
Oh, man, that is good.
BTW, with Bernie (78 yrs old) and Bloomberg (78 yrs old) as the two front runners, can the R’s now officially pass on the mantle of “party of old white men”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is crazy that Trump’s the younger candidate (73).
What it tells me is that the boomers won’t leave the stage gracefully. They will have to be kicked out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s another one from Vanity Fair. I can only access a lot of the stuff you guys link very sporadically because I gave up my subscription to the WaPo as well as others.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/bloomberg-annoys-trump-advertising-fox-news
The Times notes that some Democratic observers are “relie[ved]” by Bloomberg’s ability to annoy Trump as other candidates cannot, and as rival Democratic candidates spar with each other or emphasize policy messaging over Trump attacks, Bloomberg’s overt focus on antagonizing the president could fill a useful void. Bloomberg’s vast resources have allowed him to bombard both battleground states and Trump strongholds alike with anti-Trump messaging now known to trigger the president—which could endure even if his candidacy does not.
LikeLike
LMS, Bloomberg should run the media campaign for the Ds. He is good at it. He has a lot of professional help, too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How do we know it annoys Trump?
LikeLike
lms:
I gave up my subscription to the WaPo as well as others.
Me too! I often have to look for the WaPo links elsewhere. I refuse to pay any of my hard earned money to the WaPo. Even the apparent $1 it costs.
LikeLike
McWing, I guess they’re interpreting his ire from his tweets.
LikeLike
While that’s true sometimes, he’s seemingly much more strategic in his Dem potential nominee tweets. He tends to elevate them at different times. Tweeting about Bloomberg keeps attention on him and widens the riff w/Bernie supporters. Neither group can win w/out the other and both are irreconcilable towards each other.
LikeLike
How do we know it annoys Trump?
The left is working overtime to establish the Trump is angry and easily perturbed narrative.
LikeLike
This quote from Biden should play well:
“”I am not sending my boy back there to risk his life on behalf of women’s rights!” the vice president shouted during a private meeting in 2010 with Richard Holbrooke, President Obama’s special envoy to Afghanistan.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/02/18/biden-afghanistan-military-power/
LikeLike
I kind of feel like he’s done already. And that that story is appearing in WaPo always supports that. WaPo has decided they don’t want Biden, and want to throw their support behind someone else.
Possibly someone guaranteed to lose so Trump definitely wins and the Bezos has a clear shot at the presidency come 2024. That’s 3D chess thinking!
LikeLike
The whole thing is worth reading. He’s been all over the place. I had forgotten about this:
LikeLiked by 1 person
quite the war going on at PL over bernie vs bloomberg
LikeLike
Greg’s meltdown this morning was a sight to see.
One thing to note is that Boomberg isn’t just spending money in the Super Tuesday states, he’s been campaigning there as well.
If he pulls it off and takes the lead in delegates after Super Tuesday, it’s going to be mayhem in the Democratic party.
LikeLiked by 1 person
the funny thing was there were 3 bloomberg banner ads on the page
LikeLike
The Democrats will self-destruct.
Part of this is, for whatever reason, WaPo is clearly opposed to Bloomerg getting the nod. They’ve been pushing out stories opposed to Bloomberg a lot just recently.
LikeLike
“The Democrats will self-destruct.”
If they do, it will be because they eliminated winner take all primaries and end up with a brokered convention with three or more candidates going in.
LikeLike
I’m sure there are levels of survival they are prepared to accept.
At this point, even without a brokered convention, I don’t see this turning out well for the Democrats. Maybe. But not seeing it. Not this election cycle, anyway.
LikeLike
Bloomberg is what Trump would have been if he had run for the Democratic nomination instead of the Republican one.
And Bloomberg could have just as easily run for the Republican one (if he dropped the gun issue) if Trump had been the Democratic incumbent.
I’m starting to feel like the bystander from Superman II where he looks up seeing Superman preparing to face off against Zod, et. al and says “Man, this is gonna be good”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think he’d have to drop more than the gun issue. As far as I know he’s in favor of some sort of medical insurance that doesn’t leave those with pre-existing conditions out in the cold to fend for themselves. I don’t really know his position on most policies so I’ll watch the debate and see how he responds. He’s not one of my favorites (age being the primary factor) but if he can beat Trump, I’d prefer him over Trump and day of the week and twice on Sunday!
LikeLike
How does it help Bloomberg to appear at the debate? I’m not sure it does. Is there any doubt that Warren and Klobuchar are going to accuse him of being a sexist towards them? Is there any doubt that all of the rivals will accuse him of racism? I’m not sure he’s as deft at bullnosing his way through it as Trump. Those are cardinal sins on the left, no?
On the right being accused like that is a badge of honor.
LikeLike
Also McWing, I know you’re being facetious there.
LikeLike
Sincerely, I am being serious with my comment to you.
LikeLike
Noooooo you’re not. No one wants to be accused of sexism or racism, but if they believe it’s untrue, then they can claim a badge of honor I suppose. Denying it though doesn’t make it true or false, just a denial.
LikeLike
I really think you underestimate just how undamaging (and therefore, at a minimum, neutral) such accusations made by the left against Republicans are. If you believe that the left accuses those they disagree with sexism, misogyny and homophobia (and many Republican voters do) then to not be accused on the right is to be perceived as ineffectual against the Democrats
LikeLike
McWing, I’m not here to defend the dems who make universal claims against Rep candidates. I don’t believe most of them myself. As I said, we’ve had quite a few Presidents with problems straying from their marriage vows, several of them were Dems.
Otherwise, there are certainly some members of both parties who could sharpen up their jokes and public comments regarding women, gays, people of color……………etc. Bloomberg is one of them. If you’re in the public eye and you have a loose tongue then you should be held accountable for those comments. I don’t care which party you belong to.
LikeLike
You may be right McWing but I’m curious to see how the debate plays out. If he’s actually serious about running, rather than just supporting a way forward with D’s to get rid of Trump, then he will have to win hearts and minds of D’s. I doubt he can do that but I also doubt we will see Warren or Klobuchar going head to head with him the way you expect.
I can probably count on at least one hand, and possibly two, men who made it to the White House with the same sexist creds!
LikeLike
“As far as I know he’s in favor of some sort of medical insurance that doesn’t leave those with pre-existing conditions out in the cold to fend for themselves.”
Trump ran on the same thing. Of course, he has no plan to actually achieve it.
I also think that McWing is correct that Bloomberg would be better served to skip the debates.
LikeLike
Mark
Guys as old as I should NOT be running for POTUS. My hint for the day. BTW, after GW’s actual birthday I will change the quote at ATM. I have given GW a good run.
I totally agree with this sentiment Mark. We need younger blood in the WH. If forced to choose I suppose I could make myself vote for Bloomberg but I won’t like it. I doubt he’ll be the candidate but he does have a lot of money!
LikeLike
Isn’t there anybody like, 55 or 60 who wants to be president? I mean, other than the obvious best choice for president:
I don’t think Bloomberg takes the nomination. Irrespective of supposed polling, I have a hard time finding a Democrat who thinks Bloomberg is their guy anywhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s the only Democrat I would vote for.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same here. A lot of that being optimism that she wouldn’t be terrible and that she would think for herself and not be beholden the the DNC per se. She’s a disruptor in the style of Bernie but, I think, would be a much better president than Bernie.
But she’s not going to get the nomination. Not middle-of-the-road enough for centrists and not left enough (at least on enough tings) for the woke crowd.
LikeLike
LOL, I don’t know much about her but she is a beautiful woman! Hmmmmmmmm
LikeLike
She’s the antiwar candidate. So of course the Democrats are portraying her as a Russian dupe.
LikeLike
Trump should adopt Glenn Greenwald’s characterization of Elizabeth Warren going forward instead of “Pocahontas”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Prediction: Bloomberg picks Stacey Abrams as his VP. She’s been defending him and he gave 5 million to her organization.
LikeLike
I think the nominee will pick Abrams, whether it’s Bloomie or Sanders.
LikeLike
I think Warren would pick Cory Booker. I don’t see her picking another woman and I don’t see her picking a white man. Doesn’t leave her a lot of options.
Abrams sounds like the perfect Bloomberg pick. Sanders . . . eh, don’t know about Sanders. He’s a wildcard.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting.
https://news.sky.com/story/nhs-staff-can-refuse-to-treat-racist-or-sexist-patients-under-new-rules-11937175?dcmp=snt-sf-twitter
LikeLike
Lots of high-profile and controversial pardons/commutations from Trump.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-has-commuted-sentence-of-rod-blagojevich-11582051259?mod=hp_lead_pos1
Whatever you may think of them, at least he is making himself accountable for it by doing it pre-election.
LikeLike
So which is the proper analogy to prohibitions on abortion….forced sterilzation or a prohibition on sterilization? Pro-choicers are apparently unable to decide.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/19/alabama-democrat-suggests-forcing-vasectomies-to-prevent-unwanted-children/
Hollis is not the first lawmaker to employ the strategy of proposing regulation of male biology to make a point about supposed governmental intrusion into female biology. On March 11, 2019, Georgia Democrat state Rep. Dar’shun Kendrick proposed a “Testicular Bill of Rights” in her state. Instead of requiring vasectomies, Kendrick’s bill sought to ban them.
Do these people actually think that they are making a legitimate point with this kind of performance art, or are they just hoping the rubes fall for it?
LikeLike
It would be the latter. Regulating availability of a medical procedure isn’t the same as forcing one to undergo one.
LikeLike