Vital Statistics:
Last | Change | |
S&P Futures | 2396.3 | 3.5 |
Eurostoxx Index | 392.3 | 1.1 |
Oil (WTI) | 51.1 | -0.1 |
US dollar index | 88.6 | |
10 Year Govt Bond Yield | 2.25% | |
Current Coupon Fannie Mae TBA | 102.6 | |
Current Coupon Ginnie Mae TBA | 103.81 | |
30 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage | 4 |
Stocks are higher this morning despite a terrorist attack in the UK. Bonds and MBS are up.
New Home sales came in at 569,000, lower than the 620,000 estimate. The median new home sale price was 309k. The average was 369k. New Home Sales are still lagging population growth.
The Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index declined in April as well.
The DC Appeals Court will hear arguments Wednesday to reconsider its decision that the current structure of the CFPB is unconstitutional. If the CFPB loses its case, it will probably have to be re-worked, with a committee instead of a single director who will be accountable to the President. Trump has said he isn’t in favor of killing the agency, but would like to make some modifications.
Merrill Lynch is taking down its inflation forecasts for the year. They are taking their estimate for end of 2017 CPI to 1.9% from 2.3% and its estimate for core PCE to 1.7% from 1.9%. The core PCE is the inflationary index the Fed targets. Merrill is identifying some transitory drivers, so they expect inflation to return to target levels in 2018. Don’t forget, we will get the FOMC minutes tomorrow, which will give some further color on what the Fed was thinking last month, especially given the political environment in DC. Their Fed Funds forecast was based on an assumption that fiscal stimulus will get passed, and that looks impossible at this point.
Minneapolis Fed Head Neel Kashkari wants to see more data before making a decision on a June hike. The June Fed Funds futures are factoring at 78% chance of a 25 basis point hike. Note as well that the yield curve continues to flatten from its post-election steepening. The twos-tens spread (basically the difference between the 10 year yield and the 2 year yield) is the lowest since October.
Trump outlined his proposed budget, which cuts domestic spending by $3.6 trillion over 10 years. His budget doesn’t touch Social Security, Medicare, or defense. This is largely an ideological document that will never pass – in fact one of Obama’s proposed budgets couldn’t muster up even one Democratic vote. There is talk that the budget will cut HUD’s Community Development Block Grant Program, which runs Meals on Wheels and also doles out money for things like bike lanes, public spaces, etc. Based on trial balloons floated earlier in the administration the rest of HUD’s budget looks like it will be untouched.
Filed under: Economy, Morning Report |
Anything to avoid saying it’s about Islam.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2017/05/22/the_bombing_at_a_manchester_ariana_grande_show_was_an_attack_on_girls_and.html
LikeLike
They obviously need more domestic, white Anglo Saxon terrorists in the UK. Then they can explain how it was probably them and its really all their fault.
Personally, I think it’s wrong to blame Islam, or radical Islamic terrorism. It’s also wrong but a better try to blame girls and women.
Clearly, the blame here lies with Ariana Grande.
LikeLike
The victims of Monday’s bombing will almost certainly be mostly girls and women.
I love the modern era. Where fact-free speculation is the currency of the media. And what, exactly, is supposed to allow me to distinguish between Slate and any other source of fake news?
No clue as to the goal of terrorism, or the effort to deconstruct Western pop-culture, or the desire to cause a stampede and get fellow concern-goers to kill more people than the explosion. That whole article is just so wrong on almost every level.
And bizarre that the article makes a case that the act was a specific attack on women and girls and homosexuals (while not noting it’s their status in Western society more so than the fact of them that makes them objectionable to certain folks) and not mentioning that Islam is not a big fan of homosexuals or sexually liberated, independent women.
The goal being, presumably, to continue to cultivate a society that makes more such attacks happen, while feeling morally superior. The ultimate issue is not senseless death or the tearing down of Western values, but the opportunity to preen.
LikeLike
The goal is to make terrorism about men, not Islam, and to use that as an excuse to hector heterosexual white males about toxic masculinity…
LikeLike
Could be about radical Islamist males who hate homosexuals and western pop music and probably girls in general. But I get your point.
Do we know who actually did the bombing yet? I have been out of the loop.
LikeLike
Yes. ISIS claimed responsibility and they have identified the bomber, Salman Abedi, 22.
http://time.com/4790201/isis-manchester-concert-terrorist-attack/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/05/23/manchester-arena-terror-attack/102044682/#
LikeLike
“Could be about radical Islamist males who hate homosexuals and western pop music and probably girls in general. ”
No, it’s about getting the most casualties and biggest media attention. It wasn’t about homosexuals, western pop music or girls when they hit the Eagles of Death Metal concert in Paris.
They just wanted a better target.
LikeLike
I don’t recall similar speculation about how the patriarchy was involved when ISIS hit the Eagles of Death Metal concert in Paris.
LikeLike
lots of pearl-clutching over Trump calling terrorists evil losers…
LikeLike
It’s the Trump version of calling them criminals instead of terrorists because of the presumption that calling them terrorists somehow validates and elevates them.
The truth is that they don’t care what the West calls them.
Adams is wrong here. It’s not going to matter what Trump says.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/160986020961/goodbye-isis-hello-losers
LikeLike
Exactly.
LikeLike
At least one opinion writer admits that metal heads are just as worthy of being terrorists’ victims as girls are:
LikeLike
I experience this a lot when I’ve discussed politics in certain venues:
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/160696999931/how-to-know-you-won-a-political-debate-on-the
LikeLike
aka… “Why do you hate X?”
LikeLike
I’ll be in my bunk.
“Her loss immediately set off protests from hundreds of her backers, many of whom charged that there were irregularities that included allowing voters to cast proxy ballots without proper ID.”
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/22/california-democrats-bernie-sanders-238701
LikeLike
CNN is warning viewers not to jump to conclusions, that the Manchester bombing could be a right wing false flag operation…
LikeLike
Are you serious?
LikeLike
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-paul-cruickshank-suggests-right-wing-false-flag-during-unfolding-manchester-report/
LikeLike
This is the only thing I can find on any German “false flag” operations.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/german-soldiers-false-flag-arrests-refugees-assassinate-plot-far-right-left-wing-politicians-terror-a7726676.html
LikeLike
Projection. The best talent of the left…
LikeLike
Brent:
CNN is warning viewers not to jump to conclusions, that the Manchester bombing could be a right wing false flag operation…
Did CNN actually say that?
LikeLike
“that the Manchester bombing could be a right wing false flag operation…”
and they wonder why Breixt and Trump won.
LikeLike
Yep.
The other thing about the statistical argument you were making this morning over on PL, is that when progressives lie about something like that which is easily checked, it bleeds over into things like climate change.
See also the media discrediting itself generally by doing things like putting fireworks on cars to demonstrate that the gas tank is defective.
LikeLike
Interesting piece on Thomas and the North Carolina gerrymandering case.
LikeLike
jnc (from TNR):
But not only has he been a more than able justice (whether one substantively agrees with him or not), he has brought a unique perspective to the Court that could not have been provided by a more generic Republican nominee.
I don’t agree with that. I don’t think Thomas has brought a “unique” perspective to bear because of his race. I think he is uniquely positioned because of his race to articulate certain perspectives without fear of being labelled a racist, but that is not quite the same thing.
LikeLike
I think his background mattered but race was only one component of that. I always appreciate his skepticism of the value of the Ivy League, for example.
I do like that the author acknowledges this:
“In part because he rarely speaks at oral argument, there was a common perception that Thomas is just a clone of the late Antonin Scalia. This assumption—which, in some cases, carried the odor of racist condescension—is profoundly wrong.”
Also, this isn’t actually true:
“without fear of being labelled a racist”
He just gets called a race traitor instead.
LikeLike
jnc:
I do like that the author acknowledges this:
Yeah, I agree with the author on that one.
He just gets called a race traitor instead.
True, that is a fair point, but my sense is that such a charge carries a lot less weight in the public consciousness than does the racist charge that would surely be lobbed at whites who made the same arguments.
LikeLike
In terms of trying to discredit Thomas to the public, I think it’s a wash.
He’s a racist if he’s white and makes the argument and a race traitor if he’s black and makes the same argument. It’s ad hominem either way. If anything, I think Thomas is more ostracized by the Ivy League set than a white justice with the same views would have been.
LikeLike
jnc:
If anything, I think Thomas is more ostracized by the Ivy League set than a white justice with the same views would have been.
Very probably.
LikeLike
“Thomas is the only holdover from the 2001 case who didn’t switch sides, which is both a credit to Thomas and a demonstration of how partisan views of racial gerrymanders have changed.”
but he’s just Scalia’s stooge.
/barf
LikeLike
Yep, women and minorities hardest hit:
“Every terrorist attack is an atrocity. But there’s something uniquely cowardly and especially cruel in targeting a venue filled with girls and young women.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/05/manchester-attacks-ariana-grande/527736/
Because the lives of the metal fans killed in Paris don’t matter as much as Ariana Grande fans.
“But the Manchester bombing delivers another message, too. It reminds girls and young women that there will always be people who hate them simply because they were born female.”
No, it’s because they are in the West which is in a war with the Islamists. But that can’t be admitted because they have victim status so best to blame the “patriarchy” instead.
LikeLike
Nope, there is a hierarchy of victimhood… Not to mention metal is icky…
LikeLike
Well, the “band” Boston is icky.
LikeLike
i don’t know. seems this is an actual war on women.
unlike policy disputes we have here.
LikeLike
the comments on that are pretty good
LikeLike
what right do you have as a cis white male to tell me that there hasn’t been more abortion clinic bombings than Islamic terror attacks? Why do you hate women? How does it feel to be so white, male and perfect?
Christ, the crazy…
LikeLike
Good piece on the broader picture:
“The Manchester Attack Shows How Terrorists Learn
Can governments be as innovative about saving lives?
Daveed Gartenstein-Ross”
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/05/manchester-terrorism-isis-attack-al-qaeda/527748/
LikeLike
Still amazes me that the ordinarily religion-phobic left has decided to become BFFs with Islam
https://www.rt.com/news/389372-indonesia-gay-couple-caned/
LikeLike
Someone gets it:
“What Progressives Miss About Arms Sales
Celebrating their success in retaining blue-collar jobs is one way Republicans are winning the votes of working-class Americans.
Andrew Exum”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/americas-right-to-sell-arms/527805/
LikeLike
Arming Sunni States is thaw equivalent of Kissenger’s “It’s a pity both sides can’t lose.”
LikeLike
Interesting take on Comey.
“The guy who predicted Comey’s memos thinks Comey may be trying to take down Trump
By Aaron Blake
May 17”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/05/17/the-guy-who-predicted-comeys-memos-thinks-comey-may-be-trying-to-take-down-president-trump/
LikeLike
National Review is absolutely right:
LikeLike
But that is too facile – like fighting The War on Drugs.
Islamic extremism, the greatest feeder of terrorism, must be addressed by how the west treats Saudi support of Wahhabism, as well as how Iran supports Hizbollah and Pakistan supports the Taliban. Even that is too simple.
The invasion of Afghanistan made sense early on, in hindsight (for me, anyway) the invasion of Iraq was a bad idea. It can be said that the west spent more than a trillion bucks – mainly the US, but also the UK and some others, because of 9-11 “to stop terrorism”.
It is a workable strategy that is lacking, not the will. Again, like The War on Drugs.
LikeLike
I think both are lacking at this point.
LikeLike
Mark:
It is a workable strategy that is lacking, not the will.
The key word there is “workable”. A part of what makes a strategy “workable”, perhaps the key part, is a willingness to implement it. I don’t think our culture has the will to implement what it takes to protect ourselves from Islamic extremism. We can’t even manage the very basic step of preventing immigration from places and populations from which these terrorists originate, much less taking the war to their own homes and destroying them in place. We don’t have the stomach for what it takes.
LikeLike
It is because the left views Islamophobia as a bigger sin than terrorism…
LikeLike
Cue the NYT Editorial from this morning.
LikeLike
Meh, nothing a bunch of Coexist bumper stickers can’t fix…
LikeLike
From the NYT:
it is important to recognize this attack for what it is: an attempt to shake Britain — and, by extension, the rest of Europe and the West — to its core, and to provoke a thirst for vengeance and a desire for absolute safety so intense, it will sweep away the most cherished democratic values and the inclusiveness of diverse societies. The Islamic State wants nothing more than to watch Western democracies embrace its mad version of a holy war pitting Muslims against Christians, the newly arrived against others.
Who believes this idiocy? Do the people at the NYT even believe it themselves?
LikeLike
Virtue signaling.
Wanna send a message? Nuke Raqqa.
LikeLike
Virtue signaling.
Wanna send a message? Nuke Raqqa.
I would love to see Katy Perry do a show there…
LikeLike